Heat metering: Socio-technical challenges in district-heated social housing

Morgenstern, P; Lowe, R and Chiu, L F (2015) Heat metering: Socio-technical challenges in district-heated social housing. Building Research & Information, 43(2), pp. 197-209. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Individual heat metering and charging (IMC) are seen as promising methods to reduce domestic heating and hot water use through the provision of financial incentives. The heat consumption measured by meters is influenced by both the dwelling characteristics and the behaviour of the occupant, but heating charges would ideally relate to occupant behaviour only. This dilemma can be especially relevant under two circumstances: if the thermal performance of the dwelling is poor and/or if heating costs represent a substantial part of the occupants' income, i.e. in social housing. The case of a district-heated council block in London is presented where the installation of individual heat meters was planned in 2010 but had to be suspended due to concerns about implications for occupant heating costs in light of the thermal performance of the building. It illustrates a technically and socially complex environment where fairness in allocating heating costs is an important concern. The case also shows how lack of funding or other issues on the infrastructure side can hinder behaviour-orientated measures such as IMC. A holistic energy conservation strategy addressing both physical building properties and occupant behaviour is therefore essential and should be supported by policy.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: district heating; energy demand; energy management; fairness; housing; metering; mixed tenure; social housing
Index terms: socio-technical, energy demand, domestic heating, financial incentive, district heating, strategy, thermal performance, funding, fairness, income, London, energy conservation, occupant behaviour, energy management, tenure, housing, social housing, consumption
Subjects: economic analysis, energy systems, real estate economics, sustainability and energy, health behaviours and lifestyles, consumer economics, mechanical systems, construction type, leadership, housing and residential development, Geography, research methods, management
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here