A socio-technical framework of zero-carbon building policies

Pan, W and Ning, Y (2015) A socio-technical framework of zero-carbon building policies. Building Research & Information, 43(1), pp. 94-110. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Zero-carbon building (ZCB) is regarded as an innovative and important approach to reducing both carbon emissions and energy consumption. Policies promoting ZCB have been explicitly set in several countries and regions. Other countries have developed relevant initiatives or demonstration projects. However, the sharing of knowledge of policies on ZCB is limited and challenging. A socio-technical transition framework is developed based on an examination of ZCB policies and the supporting literature. This framework depicts the technical systems of ZCB policies within the regulatory, social and geographical contexts. The technical systems comprise four components: carbon reduction targets and a timeline; a ZCB definition and scope; a carbon emission measure and indicator; and a reliance on renewable energy. This systems approach shows that reliance on only technical solutions is constrained to achieving the zero-carbon target, yet human behaviours are poorly addressed in the policies. Thus, a significant gap exists between policy intentions and actual practices. The developed framework can inform discussion on current and future ZCB policies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: carbon emission; energy policy; net-zero; socio-technical system; stakeholder engagement; zero-carbon building
Index terms: carbon reduction, carbon emission, socio-technical, human behaviour, energy policy, energy consumption, stakeholder engagement, socio-technical system, renewable energy
Subjects: energy systems, public policy, climate science, community and social dimensions, health behaviours and lifestyles, research methods, theoretical framing
Topics: Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Governance
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here