Parkinson, T and De Dear, R (2015) Thermal pleasure in built environments: Physiology of alliesthesia. Building Research & Information, 43(3), pp. 288-301. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
International standards that define thermal comfort in uniform environments are based on the steady-state heat balance equation that posits 'neutrality' as the optimal occupant comfort state for which environments are designed. But thermal perception is more than an outcome of a deterministic, steady-state heat balance. Thermal alliesthesia is a conceptual framework to understand the hedonics of a much larger spectrum of thermal environments than the more thoroughly researched concept of thermal neutrality. At its simplest, thermal alliesthesia states that the hedonic qualities of the thermal environment are determined as much by the general thermal state of the subject as by the environment itself. A peripheral thermal stimulus that offsets or counters a thermoregulatory load-error will be pleasantly perceived and vice versa, a stimulus that exacerbates thermoregulatory load-error will feel unpleasant. The present paper elaborates the thermophysiological hypothesis of alliesthesia with a particular focus on set-point control and the origins of thermoregulatory load-error signals, and then discusses them within the broader context of thermal pleasure. Alliesthesia provides an overarching framework within which diverse and previously disconnected findings of laboratory experiments, field studies and even comfort standards spanning the last 40 years of thermal comfort research can be more coherently understood.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptation; air-conditioning; alliesthesia; non-steady-state environments; physiology; thermal comfort; thermal pleasure; thermoreceptors |
| Index terms: | thermal perception, non-steady-state environment, thermal comfort, built environment, comfort, conceptual framework, thermal environment, thermal pleasure, laboratory, field study, heat balance, neutrality, adaptation, experiment |
| Subjects: | environmental science, ethical practice, data collection methods, user focus, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental engineering, thermal systems, occupational health and safety management, research management, building performance, theoretical framing, research methods |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here