Innovation in construction education: The role of culture in e-learning

Liu, A; Hodgson, G and Lord, W (2010) Innovation in construction education: The role of culture in e-learning. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6(2), pp. 91-102. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

The effectiveness of e-learning depends on technological support, institutional culture, staff development and students' receptivity and learning behaviours. The relationship of e-learning culture and the issues of crosscultural delivery is important when learners expect online interactivity. Positive learning outcomes and academic achievement are not linked only to online course communication. Students' learning behaviours also play a role in the overall success of e-learning implementation. Successful online delivery requires shifts, both in understanding and in behaviours, for the change in pedagogical curriculum development. This article proposes a research framework to investigate the current e-learning diffusion in construction-related programmes in UK's higher education and the effect of organizational (and/or national) culture on students' learning behaviours and e-learning effectiveness.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: culture; e-learning diffusion; learning behaviours
Index terms: higher education, academic achievement, e-learning, implementation, effectiveness, construction education, curriculum development, programme, learning outcome
Subjects: educational technology, educational resources, curriculum development, educational institutions, student development, contractual arrangements, project controls, performance management, professional education
Topics: Quality Management, Time Control, Procurement, Education
Descriptive scope: 1 C

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here