Improvement alternatives for determining the watertightness performance of building facades

Perez-Bella, J M; Dominguez-Hernandez, J; Cano-Suñen, E; Del Coz-Diaz, J J and Alvarez Rabanal, F P (2015) Improvement alternatives for determining the watertightness performance of building facades. Building Research & Information, 43(6), pp. 723-736. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The accurate determination of a facade's watertightness performance is important for optimizing design. Different micro-climatic conditions can affect water penetration. The recently developed Bayesian method allows this performance to be estimated for any operating condition and location, based on the results of standardized watertightness tests. This performance-based method uses semi-empirical calculations for wind-driven rain, estimates of wind velocity based on the wind profile power law and analyses of the annual maximum climatic data. This method determines the return period of climatic conditions that each facade system can withstand. Alternative approximations are studied that may be implemented using the Bayesian method to obtain more precise or functional estimations: improved friction coefficients, peaks-over-threshold analyses or catch ratios from computational fluid dynamics (CFD), among others. The effects of these alternatives on the results of the Bayesian method were evaluated by analysing different case studies in two cities in Spain. This analysis suggests that the original formulation of the method underestimates watertightness performance and highlights the fundamental importance of wind velocity to estimate the performance of any facade accurately. This will provide greater precision for estimating facade performance and provides potential for introducing performance-based codes for watertightness.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building envelope; climate loads; facade design; performance assessment; rain; watertightness; wind; winddriven rain
Index terms: estimate, penetration, performance-based, building envelope, performance assessment, wind-driven rain, estimating, rain, computational fluid dynamics, Spain, estimation, case study, climatic condition
Subjects: data collection methods, climate science, modelling and simulation, financial and cost management, architectural elements, performance measurement, Geography, assessment methods, market analysis
Topics: Human Resources, Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here