Robinson, J and Cole, R J (2015) Theoretical underpinnings of regenerative sustainability. Building Research & Information, 43(2), pp. 133-143. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Over the past half century, a discourse emphasizing environmental constraints and limits has both informed and provided many valuable ways of responding to complex environmental problems and has strongly shaped green building practices and associated environmental assessment methods. This paper delineates the concept of regenerative sustainability - a net-positive approach to sustainability that is rooted in the notion of procedural sustainability and a particular stream of constructivist social theory. The paper contrasts this to the concept of regenerative development and design which, although having many commonalities, is based on different philosophical underpinnings. Since the origins of regenerative sustainability and regenerative design lie primarily in the social and ecological domains respectively, understanding their relationship is of importance in formulating approaches for the successful co-evolution of human and natural systems. The paper describes this relationship between regenerative sustainability and regenerative design, including a discussion of some of the key points of convergence and divergence between them, and concludes with an exploration of the practical implications of the regenerative sustainability concept.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design philosophy; net-positive; regenerative design; regenerative sustainability; sustainability; sustainable design |
| Index terms: | environmental assessment, philosophy, green building, regenerative design, stream, social theory, exploration, sustainable design, evolution |
| Subjects: | social theory, philosophical studies, sustainability and energy, environmental impact, design process, water management, design practice, environmental resource management, environmental science |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Research Practice, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here