Warwick, E (2015) Policy to reality: Evaluating the evidence trajectory for English eco-towns. Building Research & Information, 43(4), pp. 486-498. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Can evidence reconcile idealized policy formation processes with the messy reality of large-scale sustainable projects? Was the main driver of the UK eco-towns project the national housing need or a local version of sustainability? To answer, this paper traces the progress of the eco-town policy: from a government-funded initiative to start a cohort of new towns, via the first pilot sites, to the delivery of a single eco-town. It maps the national policy intent, which incorporated industry and academic expertise into a strategic policy vision. Then the local interpretation of this generic eco-town definition is reviewed, along with how the authoritative knowledge on innovative eco-planning is distilled into guidance. By revisiting the original eco-town objectives, comparing them with the recently published garden cities prospectus, the limitations for intra-national implementation of national policy frameworks are considered, asking whether any lessons have been incorporated in the current round of policy formation. The success or failure of such policy implementation is found to be more of a socio-political exercise than an empirical or rationalist process. The eco-towns were less an attempt to establish new forms of sustainable habitations than a political attempt to use eco-planning to justify new large-scale housing settlements.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; eco-town; garden cities; policy design; policy evaluation; policy formation; public policy; sustainable development |
| Index terms: | housing, built environment, implementation, policy evaluation, sustainable development, public policy, evidence, national policy, maps, housing need, policy implementation, policy formation, policy design, exercise |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, housing and residential development, health safety and environment, contractual arrangements, policy studies, evaluation and assessment methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, construction type, spatial and geospatial analysis, public policy |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Procurement, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here