Significance of mobility in the life-cycle assessment of buildings

Bastos, J; Batterman, S A and Freire, F (2016) Significance of mobility in the life-cycle assessment of buildings. Building Research & Information, 44(4), pp. 376-393. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

While most life-cycle assessments of buildings have focused on construction and use phases, the location of a building can significantly affect the transportation demand of its inhabitants. The life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of two representative buildings in Lisbon, Portugal, are compared: an apartment building in the city centre and a semidetached house in a suburban area. An integrated approach is used to conduct a life-cycle analysis that includes building construction, building use and user transportation. Sensitivity analyses are used to evaluate impacts for multiple locations. For the apartment, building use accounted for the largest share of energy and emissions (63-64%), while for the house, most (51-57%) of the energy and emissions were associated with user transportation. Energy and GHG emissions for suburban locations were significantly higher (by 55-115%) than those in the city-centre locations, largely due to individuals commuting by car. The analysis demonstrates the significance of transportation and highlights the importance of residence location in urban planning and environmental assessments. These results are likely to apply to other southern European cities that have expanded with significant growth in car ownership and use. To improve urban sustainability, development strategies should consider the transport infrastructure in addition to building efficiency.;  While most life-cycle assessments of buildings have focused on construction and use phases, the location of a building can significantly affect the transportation demand of its inhabitants. The life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of two representative buildings in Lisbon, Portugal, are compared: an apartment building in the city centre and a semidetached house in a suburban area. An integrated approach is used to conduct a life-cycle analysis that includes building construction, building use and user transportation. Sensitivity analyses are used to evaluate impacts for multiple locations. For the apartment, building use accounted for the largest share of energy and emissions (63-64%), while for the house, most (51-57%) of the energy and emissions were associated with user transportation. Energy and GHG emissions for suburban locations were significantly higher (by 55-115%) than those in the city-centre locations, largely due to individuals commuting by car. The analysis demonstrates the significance of transportation and highlights the importance of residence location in urban planning and environmental assessments. These results are likely to apply to other southern European cities that have expanded with significant growth in car ownership and use. To improve urban sustainability, development strategies should consider the transport infrastructure in addition to building efficiency.;While most life-cycle assessments of buildings have focused on construction and use phases, the location of a building can significantly affect the transportation demand of its inhabitants. The life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of two representative buildings in Lisbon, Portugal, are compared: an apartment building in the city centre and a semidetached house in a suburban area. An integrated approach is used to conduct a life-cycle analysis that includes building construction, building use and user transportation. Sensitivity analyses are used to evaluate impacts for multiple locations. For the apartment, building use accounted for the largest share of energy and emissions (63-64%), while for the house, most (51-57%) of the energy and emissions were associated with user transportation. Energy and GHG emissions for suburban locations were significantly higher (by 55-115%) than those in the city-centre locations, largely due to individuals commuting by car. The analysis demonstrates the significance of transportation and highlights the importance of residence location in urban planning and environmental assessments. These results are likely to apply to other southern European cities that have expanded with significant growth in car ownership and use. To improve urban sustainability, development strategies should consider the transport infrastructure in addition to building efficiency.;

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: residential buildings; planning; environmental assessment; life-cycle; buildings; greenhouse gas emissions; location; transport; primary energy; greenhouse-gas emissions; density; demand; embodied energy; neighborhood; construction materials; built environment; service life; energy analysis; greenhouse gases; life cycles; suburban areas; emissions
Index terms: built environment, ownership, energy analysis, greenhouse gas emission, construction material, city centre, greenhouse gas, embodied energy, Lisbon, environmental assessment, urban planning, sensitivity analysis, primary energy, mobility, service life, density, suburban area, efficiency, residential building, integrated approach, Portugal, building construction, gas emission, apartment building, transport infrastructure, life cycle, strategy
Subjects: environmental impact, value management, climate science, construction type, energy systems, contractual arrangements, analytical methods, urban planning, building materials, Geography, urban design, management, performance management, economics, infrastructure and transport systems, engineering analysis, environmental hazards, environmental health, asset management, building construction
Topics: Design Practice, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Procurement, Sustainability, Governance
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here