Reducing CO2 emissions from residential energy use

Drummond, P and Ekins, P (2016) Reducing CO2 emissions from residential energy use. Building Research & Information, 44(5-6), pp. 585-603. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

To achieve European Union (EU) greenhouse gas emissions of 80-95% below 1990 levels by 2050, CO2 emissions from residential energy consumption must be substantially reduced. Recognition of this has led to the introduction of a range of policy instruments at both EU and member state level. These policies are examined for the EU and the UK, first by grouping them into three pillars of policy' - standards and engagement, markets and pricing, and strategic investment (each of which focus on different domains of change' embodying different economic processes) - and then by assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each pillar in terms of instrument coverage and effectiveness. Strengths and weaknesses common to both UK and EU policy landscapes are found, including a comprehensive but broadly ineffective standards and engagement pillar of policy, and an ineffective markets and pricing landscape (including effective subsidization of energy consumption in the UK, permitted by the EU), with poor coverage. The strategic investment landscape is found (until recently) to be substantially stronger in the UK compared with EU instruments and requirements. Priority reform actions are also proposed to address the weaknesses identified. The paper also offers discussion of recent policy developments in the UK.;  To achieve European Union (EU) greenhouse gas emissions of 80-95% below 1990 levels by 2050, CO2 emissions from residential energy consumption must be substantially reduced. Recognition of this has led to the introduction of a range of policy instruments at both EU and member state level. These policies are examined for the EU and the UK, first by grouping them into three 'pillars of policy' - standards and engagement, markets and pricing, and strategic investment (each of which focus on different 'domains of change' embodying different economic processes) - and then by assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each pillar in terms of instrument coverage and effectiveness. Strengths and weaknesses common to both UK and EU policy landscapes are found, including a comprehensive but broadly ineffective standards and engagement pillar of policy, and an ineffective markets and pricing landscape (including effective subsidization of energy consumption in the UK, permitted by the EU), with poor coverage. The strategic investment landscape is found (until recently) to be substantially stronger in the UK compared with EU instruments and requirements. Priority reform actions are also proposed to address the weaknesses identified. The paper also offers discussion of recent policy developments in the UK.;

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: choice; construction & building technology; policy formation; performance; buildings; climate policy; energy efficiency; regulations; energy policy; policy measures; efficiency gap; consumption; energy consumption; emission standards; environmental policy; emissions
Index terms: energy policy, European Union, regulation, strategic investment, greenhouse gas emission, policy formation, emission standard, effectiveness, climate policy, energy consumption, policy measure, efficiency, energy efficiency, CO2 emissions, building technology, consumption, markets, environmental policy, pricing, policy instrument, residential energy
Subjects: sustainability and energy, political science, consumer economics, engineering systems, climate policy, policy studies, financial and cost management, energy systems, sustainable engineering, environmental health, physical geography and landforms, air quality, economic analysis, performance management, public policy
Topics: Geographical Context, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Governance, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here