Fagan-Watson, B and Burchell, K (2016) Heatwave planning: Community involvement in co-producing resilience. Building Research & Information, 44(7), pp. 754-763. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Drawing on a thematic analysis of relevant policy documents, an apparent disconnect is identified between two associated contemporary UK policy areas: planning for heatwaves and community resilience. Regional and national policy documents that plan for heatwaves in the UK tend to focus on institutional emergency responses and infrastructure development. In these documents, although communities are mentioned, they are understood as passive recipients of resilience that is provided by active institutions. Meanwhile, contemporary discussion about community resilience highlights the potential for involving communities in planning for and responding to emergencies (although the concept is also the subject of critique). To improve heatwave preparation, planning and response, more effort by central and local governments is required to articulate and realize greater participation by individuals, and voluntary and community sector groups.; Drawing on a thematic analysis of relevant policy documents, an apparent disconnect is identified between two associated contemporary UK policy areas: planning for heatwaves and community resilience. Regional and national policy documents that plan for heatwaves in the UK tend to focus on institutional emergency responses and infrastructure development. In these documents, although communities are mentioned, they are understood as passive recipients of resilience that is provided by active institutions. Meanwhile, contemporary discussion about community resilience highlights the potential for involving communities in planning for and responding to emergencies (although the concept is also the subject of critique). To improve heatwave preparation, planning and response, more effort by central and local governments is required to articulate and realize greater participation by individuals, and voluntary and community sector groups.;Drawing on a thematic analysis of relevant policy documents, an apparent disconnect is identified between two associated contemporary UK policy areas: planning for heatwaves and community resilience. Regional and national policy documents that plan for heatwaves in the UK tend to focus on institutional emergency responses and infrastructure development. In these documents, although communities are mentioned, they are understood as passive recipients of resilience that is provided by active institutions. Meanwhile, contemporary discussion about community resilience highlights the potential for involving communities in planning for and responding to emergencies (although the concept is also the subject of critique). To improve heatwave preparation, planning and response, more effort by central and local governments is required to articulate and realize greater participation by individuals, and voluntary and community sector groups.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | urban politics; built environment; resilient cities; heatwave; co-production; adaptation; resilience; public policy; climate change; politics; construction & building technology; city; renewable energy; summer; planning |
| Index terms: | summer, climate change, infrastructure development, heatwave, local government, built environment, building technology, renewable energy, drawing, critique, public policy, emergency response, documents, urban politic, community involvement, national policy, community resilience, co-production, thematic analysis, resilient city, adaptation, politics |
| Subjects: | professional development, infrastructure and transport systems, user focus, safety engineering, sustainability and resilience, evaluation and assessment methods, infrastructure engineering, political science, climate science, public policy, urban planning, technical documentation, administrative law, energy systems, community and social dimensions, engineering systems, innovation studies, social equity, methods and analysis |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Design Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Information Management, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here