Trends in home computing and energy demand

Terry, N and Palmer, J (2016) Trends in home computing and energy demand. Building Research & Information, 44(2), pp. 175-187. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Household energy demand due to domestic computer usage has changed beyond recognition over the past thirty years. Computers are now used in most homes, almost every day and laptop ownership has overtaken traditional desktop computers. Mobile devices give access to services that in the past required desktops, and they are usually more energy efficient. Today's computers usually rely on wireless routers that are often run all day. The effect of these changes on electricity use in the home has been profound. At least 60% more electricity was used for UK home computing in 2012 than in 1990. The implications of recent changes in information technology use are assessed for domestic electricity use and carbon emissions, using data from the Household Electricity Survey (HES) - the most detailed survey of electricity consumption in UK homes. On average, routers use twice as much energy per day as the laptops they serve. Laptops also draw power at a different time of day compared with desktop computers - which has implications for generation. Policy and practical recommendations are made for reducing energy use for information technology, including the estimated energy savings that could be achieved if UK routers met the US Energy Star standard for energy efficiency.;Household energy demand due to domestic computer usage has changed beyond recognition over the past thirty years. Computers are now used in most homes, almost every day and laptop ownership has overtaken traditional desktop computers. Mobile devices give access to services that in the past required desktops, and they are usually more energy efficient. Today's computers usually rely on wireless routers that are often run all day. The effect of these changes on electricity use in the home has been profound. At least 60% more electricity was used for UK home computing in 2012 than in 1990. The implications of recent changes in information technology use are assessed for domestic electricity use and carbon emissions, using data from the Household Electricity Survey (HES) - the most detailed survey of electricity consumption in UK homes. On average, routers use twice as much energy per day as the laptops they serve. Laptops also draw power at a different time of day compared with desktop computers - which has implications for generation. Policy and practical recommendations are made for reducing energy use for information technology, including the estimated energy savings that could be achieved if UK routers met the US Energy Star standard for energy efficiency.;

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: energy monitoring; household appliances; information and communications technologies; plug loads; energy demand; energy use behaviour; energy consumption; trends; computers; energy efficiency; electricity; information technology
Index terms: electricity consumption, energy-use behaviour, energy use, information technology, energy-saving, household, energy consumption, ownership, computing, communications technology, energy star, energy monitoring, survey, energy efficiency, router, carbon emission, energy demand
Subjects: economics, demography, networking, data collection methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, computing systems, climate science, sustainability and energy, energy systems, innovation and technology management
Topics: Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here