Multi-criteria analysis for the integrated performance assessment of complex fenestration systems

Basurto, C; Kämpf, J H and Scartezzini, J-L (2017) Multi-criteria analysis for the integrated performance assessment of complex fenestration systems. Building Research & Information, 45(8), pp. 926-942. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Complex fenestration systems (CFS) designed to collect and redirect daylight from the sky-vault are generally placed on the upper part of a window in order to improve the distribution of indoor daylight. Due to their additional function as solar protection, their use might contribute to the mitigation of the unfavourable effects that the admission of daylight signifies, especially in buildings located in prevailing sunny climates (risk of glare and overheating). An appropriate selection of the CFS that better contributes to improve the interior daylight environment would imply an integrated performance assessment taking into account relevant aspects such as indoor daylight distribution and the visual and thermal comfort of occupants. However, such an assessment implies the use of performance criteria with different targets; therefore, in order to evaluate their overall performance, a multi-criteria analysis is applied in this study. The method presented here describes a comprehensive evaluation to determine those CFS that better contribute to an improved indoor daylighting environment in a building located in a prevailing sunny climate. The CFS performance assessment was undertaken with computer simulations using their bi-directional transmission distribution function (BTDF).;Complex fenestration systems (CFS) designed to collect and redirect daylight from the sky-vault are generally placed on the upper part of a window in order to improve the distribution of indoor daylight. Due to their additional function as solar protection, their use might contribute to the mitigation of the unfavourable effects that the admission of daylight signifies, especially in buildings located in prevailing sunny climates (risk of glare and overheating). An appropriate selection of the CFS that better contributes to improve the interior daylight environment would imply an integrated performance assessment taking into account relevant aspects such as indoor daylight distribution and the visual and thermal comfort of occupants. However, such an assessment implies the use of performance criteria with different targets; therefore, in order to evaluate their overall performance, a multi-criteria analysis is applied in this study. The method presented here describes a comprehensive evaluation to determine those CFS that better contribute to an improved indoor daylighting environment in a building located in a prevailing sunny climate. The CFS performance assessment was undertaken with computer simulations using their bi-directional transmission distribution function (BTDF).;Complex fenestration systems (CFS) designed to collect and redirect daylight from the sky-vault are generally placed on the upper part of a window in order to improve the distribution of indoor daylight. Due to their additional function as solar protection, their use might contribute to the mitigation of the unfavourable effects that the admission of daylight signifies, especially in buildings located in prevailing sunny climates (risk of glare and overheating). An appropriate selection of the CFS that better contributes to improve the interior daylight environment would imply an integrated performance assessment taking into account relevant aspects such as indoor daylight distribution and the visual and thermal comfort of occupants. However, such an assessment implies the use of performance criteria with different targets; therefore, in order to evaluate their overall performance, a multi-criteria analysis is applied in this study. The method presented here describes a comprehensive evaluation to determine those CFS that better contribute to an improved indoor daylighting environment in a building located in a prevailing sunny climate. The CFS performance assessment was undertaken with computer simulations using their bi-directional transmission distribution function (BTDF).;

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: EnergyPlus; radiance; complex fenestration systems daylighting; bi-directional transmission distribution function; multi-criteria analysis; visual comfort; thermal comfort; glare; construction & building technology; model; climates; computer simulation; buildings; performance assessment; indoor environments; decision analysis; visual perception; mitigation; multiple criterion; daylight; mathematical models; overheating; distribution functions
Index terms: decision analysis, computer simulation, overheating, energyplus, indoor environment, daylighting, performance criteria, mathematical model, building technology, visual comfort, performance assessment, visual perception, window, distribution function, glare, thermal comfort, mitigation
Subjects: modelling and simulation, environmental science, mathematical modelling, engineering systems, decision analysis, building performance, cognitive psychology, assessment methods, thermal systems, environmental engineering, performance measurement, architectural elements, financial risk, probability and distributions
Topics: Quality Management, Human Resources, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here