Green building standards as socio-technical actors in municipal environmental policy

Goulden, S; Erell, E; Garb, Y and Pearlmutter, D (2017) Green building standards as socio-technical actors in municipal environmental policy. Building Research & Information, 45(4), pp. 414-425. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Methods for the environmental assessment and certification of green' buildings are increasingly being adopted by local governments and other entities as a means of meeting environmental, and often energy-related, goals. Literature on building environmental assessment has examined how these tools are interpreted by stakeholders in design and construction, but less attention has been paid to their interpretation and usage as objects of policy - despite this being a channel through which they have a potentially huge impact. Based on a case study of the emergence of green building in Israel, and drawing on socio-technical literatures, this paper explores the meanings attributed to building environmental assessment in the policy context. It finds that these meanings include a platform for divergent environmental goals and a proxy measure for greenhouse gas abatement. The analysis suggests that for policy-makers, the significance of green building lies not in its constituting a set of environmental benchmarks but as a standard that gains currency as a black-boxed policy object. An open discussion is needed on the various logics driving the use of green building tools in public policy, and what they hope to achieve. Methods for the environmental assessment and certification of 'green' buildings are increasingly being adopted by local governments and other entities as a means of meeting environmental, and often energy-related, goals. Literature on building environmental assessment has examined how these tools are interpreted by stakeholders in design and construction, but less attention has been paid to their interpretation and usage as objects of policy - despite this being a channel through which they have a potentially huge impact. Based on a case study of the emergence of green building in Israel, and drawing on socio-technical literatures, this paper explores the meanings attributed to building environmental assessment in the policy context. It finds that these meanings include a platform for divergent environmental goals and a proxy measure for greenhouse gas abatement. The analysis suggests that for policy-makers, the significance of green building lies not in its constituting a set of environmental benchmarks but as a standard that gains currency as a black-boxed policy object. An open discussion is needed on the various logics driving the use of green building tools in public policy, and what they hope to achieve.;Methods for the environmental assessment and certification of 'green' buildings are increasingly being adopted by local governments and other entities as a means of meeting environmental, and often energy-related, goals. Literature on building environmental assessment has examined how these tools are interpreted by stakeholders in design and construction, but less attention has been paid to their interpretation and usage as objects of policy - despite this being a channel through which they have a potentially huge impact. Based on a case study of the emergence of green building in Israel, and drawing on socio-technical literatures, this paper explores the meanings attributed to building environmental assessment in the policy context. It finds that these meanings include a platform for divergent environmental goals and a proxy measure for greenhouse gas abatement. The analysis suggests that for policy-makers, the significance of green building lies not in its constituting a set of environmental benchmarks but as a standard that gains currency as a black-boxed policy object. An open discussion is needed on the various logics driving the use of green building tools in public policy, and what they hope to achieve.;

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: actor-network theory; local government; energy efficiency; policy process; standardization; policy instrument; green buildings; climate change; governance; sustainable development; sector; intentions; construction & building technology; construction; systems; actor-network theory; environmental assessment; greenhouse effect; green development; buildings; environmental policy; public buildings; benchmarks; public policy; greenhouse gases; standards; case studies; local governments
Index terms: standardization, green development, green building, design and construction, environmental policy, public policy, emergence, environmental assessment, policy instrument, climate change, greenhouse gas, policy process, public building, energy efficiency, local government, certification, governance, platform, building technology, socio-technical, case study, greenhouse effect, drawing, meaning, sustainable development, building environmental assessment, Israel
Subjects: climate science, engineering systems, environmental impact, business, policy studies, construction type, data collection methods, contractual arrangements, technical documentation, sustainability and energy, public policy, digital design, health safety and environment, sustainable design, Geography, research methods, performance measurement, design practice, sustainability assessment, systems engineering, administrative processes, administrative law, sociology
Topics: Quality Management, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Contract Administration, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Governance
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here