Making an engine: Performativities of building information standards

Koch, C and Beemsterboer, S (2017) Making an engine: Performativities of building information standards. Building Research & Information, 45(6), pp. 596-609. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Digitization of buildings requires the systematic handling of a variety and volumes of data. It is a common vision to aim for coordinated homogenization of data structures, enabled by the classification of information. This paper studies the role of building information standards for classification in digitization of the building life cycle. It draws on science and technology studies of information technology standards, big data and building information modelling (BIM) in building research. The approach is based on performativity of standards for information systems, viewing performativity as potentially non-linear and multiple. The five-year design process of a large hospital in Denmark is examined as episodes of performance of the building information standard, particularly one recent standard, the Cuneco Classification System (CCS). The study shows that despite client demands, several building information standards are active over time: an expansive' design brief process adds user demands and uses room classification. Another process diminishes the design brief more than 50%, with several standards in use. The client's facilities management system, which performs the structuring of data backwards' into the design process, makes architects and engineers (but not contractors) use CCS. This fragmentation of performing standards is denoted multiple performativities' and includes temporal and compartmental performativity.;Digitization of buildings requires the systematic handling of a variety and volumes of data. It is a common vision to aim for coordinated homogenization of data structures, enabled by the classification of information. This paper studies the role of building information standards for classification in digitization of the building life cycle. It draws on science and technology studies of information technology standards, big data and building information modelling (BIM) in building research. The approach is based on performativity of standards for information systems, viewing performativity as potentially non-linear and multiple. The five-year design process of a large hospital in Denmark is examined as episodes of performance of the building information standard, particularly one recent standard, the Cuneco Classification System (CCS). The study shows that despite client demands, several building information standards are active over time: an 'expansive' design brief process adds user demands and uses room classification. Another process diminishes the design brief more than 50%, with several standards in use. The client's facilities management system, which performs the structuring of data 'backwards' into the design process, makes architects and engineers (but not contractors) use CCS. This fragmentation of performing standards is denoted 'multiple performativities' and includes temporal and compartmental performativity.;Digitization of buildings requires the systematic handling of a variety and volumes of data. It is a common vision to aim for coordinated homogenization of data structures, enabled by the classification of information. This paper studies the role of building information standards for classification in digitization of the building life cycle. It draws on science and technology studies of information technology standards, big data and building information modelling (BIM) in building research. The approach is based on performativity of standards for information systems, viewing performativity as potentially non-linear and multiple. The five-year design process of a large hospital in Denmark is examined as episodes of performance of the building information standard, particularly one recent standard, the Cuneco Classification System (CCS). The study shows that despite client demands, several building information standards are active over time: an expansive' design brief process adds user demands and uses room classification. Another process diminishes the design brief more than 50%, with several standards in use. The client's facilities management system, which performs the structurin of data backwards' into the design process, makes architects and engineers (but not contractors) use CCS. This fragmentation of performing standards is denoted multiple performativities' and includes temporal and compartmental performativity.;Digitization of buildings requires the systematic handling of a variety and volumes of data. It is a common vision to aim for coordinated homogenization of data structures, enabled by the classification of information. This paper studies the role of building information standards for classification in digitization of the building life cycle. It draws on science and technology studies of information technology standards, big data and building information modelling (BIM) in building research. The approach is based on performativity of standards for information systems, viewing performativity as potentially non-linear and multiple. The five-year design process of a large hospital in Denmark is examined as episodes of performance of the building information standard, particularly one recent standard, the Cuneco Classification System (CCS). The study shows that despite client demands, several building information standards are active over time: an 'expansive' design brief process adds user demands and uses room classification. Another process diminishes the design brief more than 50%, with several standards in use. The client's facilities management system, which performs the structuring of data 'backwards' into the design process, makes architects and engineers (but not contractors) use CCS. This fragmentation of performing standards is denoted 'multiple performativities' and includes temporal and compartmental performativity.;

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: standards; hospitals; building information modelling; big data; performativity; design and build; design; innovation; trends; infrastructures; construction & building technology; modeling bim; complexity; buildings; contractors; data structures; information technology; facilities management; building components; information systems; design engineering; building construction; office buildings; data management; technology; design standards; classification; life cycle engineering; digitization; building management systems; life cycles
Index terms: performativity, building technology, design standard, design process, building research, building information modelling, building management system, office building, big data, building life cycle, design engineering, data management, building construction, science, life cycle engineering, engineer, fragmentation, life cycle, design brief, architect, design and build, information technology, complexity, building component, data structure, facilities management, information system, modelling, Denmark
Subjects: specialized education, engineering systems, computing systems, value management, design methods, profession, construction type, business, mechanical systems, social theory and frameworks, data science, contractual arrangements, analytical methods, technical documentation, Geography, architectural elements, management, structural engineering, information systems, systems engineering, data management, building construction, sustainable engineering, asset management, research management
Topics: Digital Applications, Design Practice, Education, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here