Lamb, S and Kwok, K C S (2017) Sopite syndrome in wind-excited buildings: Productivity and wellbeing impacts. Building Research & Information, 45(3), pp. 347-358. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Tall buildings vibrate in response to strong winds at frequencies below 1Hz, which can cause motion sickness and sopite syndrome in humans. Sopite syndrome is characterized by sleepiness, low motivation and low mood that can reduce productivity in office workers. This paper uses recent multidisciplinary research to estimate the cost of building motion on organizations in tall buildings, and provides a framework for future research. The potential costs of wind-induced building motion to organizations are highly variable, depending on the local weather climate, but are likely to be significant in the long-term. It is argued that wind-induced building motion is a negative externality, a cost of inadequate design passed to building users. A three-factor approach towards reducing adverse impacts of wind-induced building motion is discussed: (1) further research investigating the characteristics of motion that provoke sopite syndrome, (2) create a new generation of serviceability criteria, and (3) regulations setting the maximum acceptable motion dose for office workers. This three-factor approach will likely produce comprehensive, yet usable, guidelines to develop strategies that reduce the adverse effects of motion on occupants in both new and existing buildings.;Tall buildings vibrate in response to strong winds at frequencies below 1 Hz, which can cause motion sickness and sopite syndrome in humans. Sopite syndrome is characterized by sleepiness, low motivation and low mood that can reduce productivity in office workers. This paper uses recent multidisciplinary research to estimate the cost of building motion on organizations in tall buildings, and provides a framework for future research. The potential costs of wind-induced building motion to organizations are highly variable, depending on the local weather climate, but are likely to be significant in the long-term. It is argued that wind-induced building motion is a negative externality, a cost of inadequate design passed to building users. A three-factor approach towards reducing adverse impacts of wind-induced building motion is discussed: (1) further research investigating the characteristics of motion that provoke sopite syndrome, (2) create a new generation of serviceability criteria, and (3) regulations setting the maximum acceptable motion dose for office workers. This three-factor approach will likely produce comprehensive, yet usable, guidelines to develop strategies that reduce the adverse effects of motion on occupants in both new and existing buildings.;Tall buildings vibrate in response to strong winds at frequencies below 1 Hz, which can cause motion sickness and sopite syndrome in humans. Sopite syndrome is characterized by sleepiness, low motivation and low mood that can reduce productivity in office workers. This paper uses recent multidisciplinary research to estimate the cost of building motion on organizations in tall buildings, and provides a framework for future research. The potential costs of wind-induced building motion to organizations are highly variable, depending on the local weather climate, but are likely to be significant in the long-term. It is argued that wind-induced building motion is a negative externality, a cost of inadequate design passed to building users. A three-factor approach towards reducing adverse impacts of wind-induced building motion is discussed: (1) further research investigating the characteristics of motion that provoke sopite syndrome, (2) create a new generation of serviceability criteria, and (3) regulations setting the maximum acceptable motion dose for office workers. This three-factor approach will likely produce comprehensive, yet usable, guidelines to develop strategies that reduce the adverse effects of motion on occupants in both new and existing buildings.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | work performance; market failure; sopite syndrome; tall buildings; serviceability criteria; wellbeing; building motion; indoor environmental quality; wind; motion sickness; vibration; environment; human-performance; acceleration; construction & building technology; sympathetic-nerve activity; low-frequency noise; modulation; productivity; buildings; wind effects; building design; mood; motivation; workers; organizations; multidisciplinary research; sleepiness; sleep and wakefulness |
| Index terms: | motion sickness, building technology, tall building, building design, motivation, productivity, strategy, regulation, mood, building motion, sleepiness, indoor environmental quality, human-performance, well-being, modulation, market failure, low-frequency noise, vibration, work performance, weather, acceleration, serviceability criteria, estimate, wind effect |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, management, project controls, networking, health conditions and diseases, political science, environmental health, behavioral psychology, construction type, mental health and wellbeing, mechanical systems, air quality, engineering systems, acoustic engineering, human factors and perception, psychology, operations management, environmental science, professional practice, architectural design, economic analysis, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Governance, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Time Control, Design Practice, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here