Wong, J M W; Kong, H and Chiang, Y H (2004) A critical review of forecasting models to predict manpower demand. Construction Economics and Building, 4(2), pp. 43-56. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Forecasting manpower requirements has been useful for economic planners, policy makers and training providers in order to avoid the imbalance of skills in the labour market. Although reviews of the manpower planning models have been conducted previously, with the accumulated experience and the booming of advanced statistical techniques and computer programs, the study of forecasting practices has undrgone considerable changes and achieved maturity during the past decade. This paper assesses the latest employment and manpower dmand estimating methods by examining their rationale, strength and constraints. It aims to identify enhancements for further development of manpower forecasting model for the construction industry and compare the reliability and capacity of different forecasting metodologies. It is cocluded that the top-down forecasting approach is the dominant methodology to forecast occupational manpower demand. It precedes other methodologies by its dynamic nature and sensitivity to aa variety of factors affecting the level and structure of employment. Given the improvement of the data available, advanced modelling techniques and computer programs, manpower planning is likely to be more accessible with improved accuracy at every level of the society.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; employment forecasting; forecasting models; manpower demand; manpower planning |
| Index terms: | society, workforce planning, forecasting, labour market, planner, computer program, methodology, accuracy, estimating, construction industry, employment, modelling |
| Subjects: | profession, management, economics, software systems, research methods, professional development, operations management, industry analysis, communities and social development, prediction and forecasting, financial and cost management, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Supply Chain Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here