Supplier-driven integrated design

Van Nederveen, S; Beheshti, R and De Ridder, H (2010) Supplier-driven integrated design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6(4), pp. 241-253. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

In current building and construction (BC) practice, most design projects are initiated and driven by the client, with or without the help of architects, engineering consultants or advisers. This article discusses an alternative approach that suggests an integrated design and delivery of BC works that is based on assuming a more dominant role for the supplier in the design process, as well as assuming more decision-making responsibility for the client. This bottom-up approach greatly benefits from the system engineering and building information modelling at its core. In this set-up, the supplier has a building system consisting of standardized building elements and components. Responding to a design question, the supplier develops a design as a configuration of his building system objects. Potential benefits of this approach include possibilities for standardization, production automation and advanced simulation and performance forecasting. The living building concept provides the core of a theoretical framework for shaping this approach, taking into account that the life of a construction is dynamic and hence needs to be adaptable. This requires a new construction process with a dynamic coupling between the 'living construction' and the 'living world'.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bottom-up; industrialization; integrated design and delivery solutions; life-cycle approach; parametric design; standardization; supplier-driven; value orientation
Index terms: automation, bottom-up approach, standardization, building system, decision-making, construction process, engineering consultant, configuration, architect, industrialization, parametric design, coupling, building information modelling, forecasting, design process, living building
Subjects: urban planning, prediction and forecasting, profession, design methods, engineering systems, decision analysis, building construction, systems engineering, information systems, professional, performance measurement, economic development, design practice, automation and robotics
Topics: Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Governance, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here