Pallubinsky, H; Kingma, B R M; Schellen, L; Dautzenberg, B; van Baak, M A and van Marken Lichtenbelt, W D (2017) The effect of warmth acclimation on behaviour, thermophysiology and perception. Building Research & Information, 45(7), pp. 800-807. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Public and commercial buildings tend to overheat and considerable energy is consumed by air-conditioning and ventilation. However, many occupants remain unsatisfied and consequently exhibit thermoregulatory behaviour (TRB), e.g. opening windows or controlling the air-conditioning. This, in turn, might negatively influence the building energy use. This paper hypothesizes that warmth acclimation influences thermophysiology, perception and TRB in a warm environment. Therefore, the effect of warmth acclimation on TRB, physiology and perception is investigated. Twelve participants underwent a so-called SWITCH protocol before and after warmth acclimation (7 days, 6 h/day, about 33°C, about 22% RH). During SWITCH, the participants chose between a warm (37°C) and a cold (17°C) condition. TRB was determined by the number of switches and the time spent in a specific condition. Mean skin temperature was recorded to assess behavioural thresholds. Thermal comfort and sensation were indicated on visual analogue scales (VAS). After acclimation, the upper critical behavioural threshold significantly increased from 35.2 ± 0.6 to 35.5 ± 0.5°C (p [less-than or equal to] 0.05) and the range of mean skin temperatures at which no behaviour occurred significantly widened (3.6 ± 0.7 to 4.2 ± 0.6; p < 0.05). The total number of switches tended to decrease (p = 0.075). The present study is the first to show that prolonged passive exposure to warmth extends TRB thresholds.;Public and commercial buildings tend to overheat and considerable energy is consumed by air-conditioning and ventilation. However, many occupants remain unsatisfied and consequently exhibit thermoregulatory behaviour (TRB), e.g. opening windows or controlling the air-conditioning. This, in turn, might negatively influence the building energy use. This paper hypothesizes that warmth acclimation influences thermophysiology, perception and TRB in a warm environment. Therefore, the effect of warmth acclimation on TRB, physiology and perception is investigated. Twelve participants underwent a so-called SWITCH protocol before and after warmth acclimation (7 days, 6h/day, about 33 degrees C, about 22% RH). During SWITCH, the participants chose between a warm (37 degrees C) and a cold (17 degrees C) condition. TRB was determined by the number of switches and the time spent in a specific condition. Mean skin temperature was recorded to assess behavioural thresholds. Thermal comfort and sensation were indicated on visual analogue scales (VAS). After acclimation, the upper critical behavioural threshold significantly increased from 35.2 +/- 0.6 to 35.5 +/- 0.5 degrees C (p0.05) and the range of mean skin temperatures at which no behaviour occurred significantly widened (3.6 +/- 0.7 to 4.2 +/- 0.6; p<0.05). The total number of switches tended to decrease (p=0.075). The present study is the first to show that prolonged passive exposure to warmth extends TRB thresholds.;Public and commercial buildings tend to overheat and considerable energy is consumed by air-conditioning and ventilation. However, many occupants remain unsatisfied and consequently exhibit thermoregulatory behaviour (TRB), e.g. opening windows or controlling the air-conditioning. This, in turn, might negatively influence the building energy use. This paper hypothesizes that warmth acclimation influences thermophysiology, perception and TRB in a warm environment. Therefore, the effect of warmth acclimation on TRB, physiology and perception is investigated. Twelve participants underwent a so-called SWITCH protocol before and after warmth acclimation (7 days, 6 h/day, about 33°C, about 22% RH). During SWITCH, the participants chose between a warm (37°C) and a cold (17°C) condition. TRB was determined by the number of switches and the time spent in a specific condition. Mean skin temperature was recorded to assess behavioural thresholds. Thermal comfort and sensation were indicated on visual analogue scales (VAS). After acclimation, the upper critical behavioural threshold significantly increased from 35.2 ± €‰0.6 to 35.5 ± 0.5°C (p ≤ 0.05) and the range of mean skin temperatures at which no behaviour occurred significantly widened (3.6 ± 0.7 to 4.2 ± 0.6; p < 0.05). The total number of switches tended to decrease (p = 0.075). The present study is the first to show that prolonged passive exposure to warmth extends TRB thresholds.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | warmth acclimation; overheating; adaptive behaviour; physiology; energy demand; adaptation; thermoregulatory behaviour; thermal comfort; exercise; heat; human thermoregulatory behavior; construction & building technology; temperature; productivity; air conditioning; energy use; thresholds; buildings; switches; public buildings; acclimatization; acclimation; visual perception; visual thresholds; energy; thermoregulatory behavior; skin temperature; ventilation; perception; skin; commercial buildings; air conditioners |
| Index terms: | energy use, thermal comfort, visual threshold, visual perception, adaptation, productivity, adaptive behaviour, energy demand, exercise, acclimation, public building, acclimatization, air conditioning, exposure, commercial building, window, sensation, ventilation, overheating, building technology, skin temperature, building energy use |
| Subjects: | public and environmental health, architectural elements, design practice, management, building performance, cognitive psychology, environmental engineering, thermal systems, air quality, human factors, user focus, construction type, health behaviours and lifestyles, human factors and perception, engineering systems, sustainability and energy, energy systems |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here