Parkinson, T and de Dear, R (2017) Thermal pleasure in built environments: Spatial alliesthesia from air movement. Building Research & Information, 45(3), pp. 320-335. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
In recent years there has been a shift in research focus away from the negative effects of draught towards the positive benefits of air movement, particularly in the context of personal environmental control (PEC) systems. Thermal perception under targeted air movement is different from exposures in airflow uniformly distributed across the body, but is less well understood. Specification of performance criteria for PEC systems remains unresolved, as there are no clear conclusions regarding optimum target area, velocity ranges or patterns of velocity dynamics. This paper examines the effects of different local air-velocity profiles on thermal sensation and thermal pleasure experienced by human subjects near the upper boundary of the comfort zone, and interprets the findings within the theoretical framework of spatial alliesthesia. It was found that positive thermal pleasure can be achieved when contrasting relationships between local and global skin temperatures trends are established. The substantial body of research literature on local thermal discomfort can be coherently interpreted within the theoretical framework of spatial alliesthesia; local discomfort represents thermal alliesthesia with the incorrect polarity between local and global thermal states. Spatial alliesthesia therefore provides a conceptual framework to understand PEC systems and their potential to minimize occupant thermal dissatisfaction.;In recent years there has been a shift in research focus away from the negative effects of draught towards the positive benefits of air movement, particularly in the context of personal environmental control (PEC) systems. Thermal perception under targeted air movement is different from exposures in airflow uniformly distributed across the body, but is less well understood. Specification of performance criteria for PEC systems remains unresolved, as there are no clear conclusions regarding optimum target area, velocity ranges or patterns of velocity dynamics. This paper examines the effects of different local air-velocity profiles on thermal sensation and thermal pleasure experienced by human subjects near the upper boundary of the comfort zone, and interprets the findings within the theoretical framework of spatial alliesthesia. It was found that positive thermal pleasure can be achieved when contrasting relationships between local and global skin temperatures trends are established. The substantial body of research literature on local thermal discomfort can be coherently interpreted within the theoretical framework of spatial alliesthesia; local discomfort represents thermal alliesthesia with the incorrect polarity between local and global thermal states. Spatial alliesthesia therefore provides a conceptual framework to understand PEC systems and their potential to minimize occupant thermal dissatisfaction.;In recent years there has been a shift in research focus away from the negative effects of draught towards the positive benefits of air movement, particularly in the context of personal environmental control (PEC) systems. Thermal perception under targeted air movement is different from exposures in airflow uniformly distributed across the body, but is less well understood. Specification of performance criteria for PEC systems remains unresolved, as there are no clear conclusions regarding optimum target area, velocity ranges or patterns of velocity dynamics. This paper examines the effects of different local air-velocity profiles on thermal sensation and thermal pleasure experienced by human subjects near the upper boundary of the comfort zone, and interprets the findings within the theoretical framework of spatial alliesthesia. It was found that positive thermal pleasure can be achieved when contrasting relationships between local and global skin temperatures trends are established. The substantial body of research literature on local thermal discomfort can be coherently interpreted within the theoretical framework of spatial alliesthesia; local discomfort represents thermal alliesthesia with the incorr ct polarity between local and global thermal states. Spatial alliesthesia therefore provides a conceptual framework to understand PEC systems and their potential to minimize occupant thermal dissatisfaction.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | personal control; thermal pleasure; air movement; alliesthesia; non-steady-state environments; physiology; local discomfort; thermal comfort; personalized ventilation; comfort; draft; partial-body; flow; construction & building technology; human response; sensation; air flow; discomfort; spatial discrimination; polarity; skin; motion detection; velocity; environmental control; urban environments |
| Index terms: | thermal sensation, discomfort, local discomfort, personal control, air flow, air movement, spatial discrimination, comfort, partial-body, built environment, thermal comfort, dynamics, human response, sensation, specification, skin temperature, building technology, performance criteria, urban environment, thermal pleasure, exposure, human subject, conceptual framework, personalized ventilation, environmental control, non-steady-state environment, thermal perception |
| Subjects: | performance measurement, health risk and incident analysis, theoretical framing, spatial and geospatial analysis, public and environmental health, contractual condition, occupational health and safety management, research management, health conditions and diseases, building performance, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental engineering, systems engineering, environmental health, behavioral psychology, engineering systems, human factors and perception, urban sustainability, environmental science |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Urban Studies, Contract Administration, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here