Poirier, E A; Forgues, D and Staub-French, S (2017) Understanding the impact of BIM on collaboration: A Canadian case study. Building Research & Information, 45(6), pp. 681-695. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Facilitating collaboration amongst project stakeholders in the construction industry is one of the central tenants of building information modelling (BIM). While there is increasing evidence of the positive influence of BIM on project outcomes, ambiguity remains around BIM's true impact on collaboration. The presented case study aims to develop insights into the impact of BIM on collaboration in the architecture, engineering and construction industry. A critical realist perspective was adopted and a systematic combining approach was employed to support data collection and analysis. Data were collected through a longitudinal case study of a large design-build project in Canada. The unit of analysis was the individual project team member. Five cognitive determinants identified from the analysis are seen to inform an individual's framing of event patterns in the context of BIM-enabled collaboration: requirements, expectations, intentions, incentives and capabilities. From this perspective, the impact of BIM on collaboration is understood as a reshaping of an individual's cognitive determinants, which influence a team member's framing of event patterns enacted throughout project delivery. This shift is manifested by changing information landscapes, i.e. sources and flows of information, that are generated, shared and consumed within the project team.;Facilitating collaboration amongst project stakeholders in the construction industry is one of the central tenants of building information modelling (BIM). While there is increasing evidence of the positive influence of BIM on project outcomes, ambiguity remains around BIM's true impact on collaboration. The presented case study aims to develop insights into the impact of BIM on collaboration in the architecture, engineering and construction industry. A critical realist perspective was adopted and a systematic combining approach was employed to support data collection and analysis. Data were collected through a longitudinal case study of a large design-build project in Canada. The unit of analysis was the individual project team member. Five cognitive determinants identified from the analysis are seen to inform an individual's framing of event patterns in the context of BIM-enabled collaboration: requirements, expectations, intentions, incentives and capabilities. From this perspective, the impact of BIM on collaboration is understood as a reshaping of an individual's cognitive determinants, which influence a team member's framing of event patterns enacted throughout project delivery. This shift is manifested by changing information landscapes, i.e. sources and flows of information, that are generated, shared and consumed within the project team.;Facilitating collaboration amongst project stakeholders in the construction industry is one of the central tenants of building information modelling (BIM). While there is increasing evidence of the positive influence of BIM on project outcomes, ambiguity remains around BIM's true impact on collaboration. The presented case study aims to develop insights into the impact of BIM on collaboration in the architecture, engineering and construction industry. A critical realist perspective was adopted and a systematic combining approach was employed to support data collection and analysis. Data were collected through a longitudinal case study of a large design-build project in Canada. The unit of analysis was the individual project team member. Five cognitive determinants identified from the analysis are seen to inform an individual's framing of event patterns in the context of BIM-enabled collaboration: requirements, expectations, intentions, incentives and capabilities. From this perspective, the impact of BIM on collaboration is understood as a reshaping of an individual's cognitive determinants, which influence a team member's framing of event patterns enacted throughout project delivery. This shift is manifested by changing information landscapes, i.e. sources and flows of information, that are generated, shared and consumed within t e project team.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | information processing; critical realism; building information modelling; supply chain; cognition; collaboration; systematic combining; digital technologies; information technology; design; determinants; networks; motivation; perceived ease; boundaries; construction & building technology; construction; acceptance; incentives; architecture; data acquisition; construction engineering; cognitive ability; data processing; framing; construction industry; case studies; engineering; landscapes; cooperation; data collection; building management systems |
| Index terms: | digital technology, cooperation, boundaries, information technology, systematic combining, cognition, collaboration, cognitive ability, evidence, project stakeholder, data processing, tenant, critical realism, motivation, framing, building management system, building technology, perceived ease, information processing, construction industry, determinant, data acquisition, project team, project delivery, construction engineering, Canada, project outcome, building information modelling, case study |
| Subjects: | project delivery, conceptual models, property law, data science, psychology, practitioner, computing systems, engineering systems, research design and methodology, project completion, mechanical systems, risk assessment, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, behavioral psychology, information systems, industry analysis, sociology, cognitive psychology, Geography, engineering methods, theoretical framing, management |
| Topics: | Procurement, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Legal Issues, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here