Yang, F and Bouchlaghem, D (2010) Genetic algorithm-based multiobjective optimization for building design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6(1), pp. 68-82. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Large-scale building design is a constantly evolving process where design managers are always trying to identify means of producing a 'better' product in a 'shorter' period of time. Hence there is a need for design tools that can help designers better manage collaborative design development. It is becoming difficult to improve the performance of building design based only on improvements in individual disciplines. For this reason, better, system-orientated, holistic, multidisciplinary approaches to building design are needed. This article investigates the applicability of a multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) methodology in building design. MDO methods divide a single system into a group of smaller subsystems to effectively manage interactions between them. In the context of building design, the system refers to building design as a whole, whereas subsystems represent the various design disciplines or parts of the building, for example spatial zones. Such an approach could reduce the time and cost associated with the multidisciplinary design cycle. As an outcome of this research, a Pareto genetic algorithm-based collaborative optimization (PGACO) framework is developed to support interactions between multiple disciplinary tasks and to coordinate conflicting design objectives. The article demonstrates how the PGACO framework can be applied to a multiobjective multidisciplinary optimization problem. The framework is also tested on a simple mathematical example.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collaborative optimization; genetic algorithm; multidisciplinary building design |
| Index terms: | designer, building design, design manager, becoming, genetic algorithm, collaborative design, interaction, design optimization, methodology |
| Subjects: | behavioral psychology, philosophical process, algorithms, research methods, design process, architectural design, profession, design methods |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here