Urban geometry, SVF and insolation of open spaces: London and Paris

Chatzipoulka, C and Nikolopoulou, M (2018) Urban geometry, SVF and insolation of open spaces: London and Paris. Building Research & Information, 46(8), pp. 881-898. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The radiant environment in open spaces is very sensitive to the surrounding built form, which determines their openness to the sky and exposure to the sun. This paper presents the analysis of 132 urban forms in London and Paris, two cities at similar geographical latitude, but of different urban geometry, focusing on the relationship between urban geometry and insolation of open spaces at neighbourhood scale. The method consists of three stages: (1) the geometric analysis of the urban forms, (2) their solar access analysis and (3) the statistical exploration of the results. Special emphasis is on the sky view factor (SVF), which is employed as an integrated geometry variable and environmental performance indicator. The comparative analysis of the two cities underlines the significance of urban layout for modifying the outdoor radiant environment, and reveals temporal characteristics of the relation between urban geometry and insolation of urban forms, induced by the varying solar geometry. Indicatively, the average mean ground SVF (mSVF) was found to be primarily affected by the quantitative characteristics of the open space, and able to predict average daytime insolation on March 21 and June 21 (R2> 0.8), in both cities.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: density; microclimates; sky view factor; solar absorption; urban design; urban fabric; urban form; urban geometry; urban heat island
Index terms: built form, exposure, exploration, comparative analysis, urban design, urban fabric, urban form, microclimate, open space, Paris, London, urban heat island, latitude, density, environmental performance, geometry, sun
Subjects: mathematical modelling, climate science, environmental resource management, analytical methods, data analysis and analytics, energy systems, public and environmental health, urban form and morphology, sustainability assessment, urban design, Geography, geographical data
Topics: Sustainability, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Design Practice, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here