Zou, P X W and Leslie-Carter, R (2010) Lessons learned from managing the design of the 'water cube' national swimming centre for the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6(3), pp. 175-188. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
This article discusses the main lessons learned from the management of the design of the 'Water Cube' National Swimming Aquatic Centre (a landmark building for the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games), including forming an international partnership, managing cultural differences and risks, dealing with intellectual property and ownership of design to establish a legacy. The article also discusses design management strategies and innovations. It was found that Beijing's lack of regulatory transparency, regional differences and a relationshipbased business culture were some of the factors that made China a challenging project environment. Cultural understanding and relationship (guanxi) building were fundamental strategies in responding to these challenges. It was also found that developing a shared ownership of intellectual property and innovative design ideas may facilitate the collaboration between Western and Chinese partners. In addition, it was necessary for the foreign design and project management teams to be continuously involved in the construction stage to ensure the conversion of design into reality, construction quality and personal fulfilment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; design innovation; design management; Guanxi; interface management; international project |
| Index terms: | Beijing, Olympic Games, China, Guanxi, collaboration, interface management, partnership, ownership, lessons learned, intellectual property, project management team, business culture, international project, strategy, cultural difference, transparency, construction quality, conversion, design management |
| Subjects: | partnership management, manufacturing engineering, management, strategic management, intellectual property, cross-cultural studies, sociology, Geography, economics, design process, quality assurance, profession, business, professional development |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, International Construction, Design Practice, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Organizational Design, Information Management, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here