Frances, Z and Stevenson, F (2018) Domestic photovoltaic systems: The governance of occupant use. Building Research & Information, 46(1), pp. 23-41. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Housing is responsible for 29% of all CO2 emissions in the UK, yet there is still limited understanding of why housing routinely uses more energy than predicted, resulting in a performance gap. Recent studies attribute this gap to insufficient use of energy-efficient technologies by occupants. This paper focuses on the governance of domestic photovoltaic (PV) systems in the UK during the provision stage, an overlooked area in the previous energy-efficiency studies that have mainly focused on PV adoption and practices by occupants, but only after installation. The notion of translation in Actor Network Theory (ANT) is used to analyse how a network of PV provision actants decides the system design and integration into homes, and how this in turn conditions household participation in this network. Semi-structured interviews and video tours used in four participative community and two non-participative community case studies reveal the impact of non-human actants in terms of how PV scripts and practices are formed by PV professionals. The finding also shows that the nominated 'procurement occupants' were the key mediators in the participative projects, while the housing developers were the key mediators in the non-participative projects.;Housing is responsible for 29% of all CO 2 emissions in the UK, yet there is still limited understanding of why housing routinely uses more energy than predicted, resulting in a performance gap. Recent studies attribute this gap to insufficient use of energy-efficient technologies by occupants. This paper focuses on the governance of domestic photovoltaic (PV) systems in the UK during the provision stage, an overlooked area in the previous energy-efficiency studies that have mainly focused on PV adoption and practices by occupants, but only after installation. The notion of translation in Actor Network Theory (ANT) is used to analyse how a network of PV provision actants decides the system design and integration into homes, and how this in turn conditions household participation in this network. Semi-structured interviews and video tours used in four participative community and two non-participative community case studies reveal the impact of non-human actants in terms of how PV scripts and practices are formed by PV professionals. The finding also shows that the nominated 'procurement occupants' were the key mediators in the participative projects, while the housing developers were the key mediators in the non-participative projects.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | translation network; actants; mediators; housing; intermediaries; performance gap; occupants; photovoltaics; governance; procurement; solar cells; systems design; energy use; scripts; carbon dioxide; community participation; actor-network theory; case studies; photovoltaic cells |
| Index terms: | household, case study, integration, housing developer, housing, translation network, script, CO2 emissions, mediator, efficiency, performance gap, energy use, governance, interview, photovoltaic, solar cell, community participation, intermediary, carbon dioxide, systems design |
| Subjects: | climate science, participation process, performance management, organizational analysis, air quality, energy systems, business, design methods, construction type, sociology, demography, data collection methods, dispute resolution |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Legal Issues, Governance, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here