What next for energy-related building regulations? The occupancy phase

Gram-Hanssen, K; Georg, S; Christiansen, E and Heiselberg, P (2018) What next for energy-related building regulations? The occupancy phase. Building Research & Information, 46(7), pp. 790-803. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Building regulations are important policy instruments for increasing building energy efficiency. However, when it comes to actual energy use, studies have shown that improvements in building energy efficiency are offset by changes in the inhabitants' comfort practices. Nevertheless, the improvement of energy efficiency continues to be a cornerstone in building regulations, with no consideration of how this simultaneously influences everyday practices. The example of Danish building regulations, which are among the strictest in Europe, is critically reviewed for the implications regulatory design can have for reducing energy consumption. Based on readings of policy documents, consultancy reports and research papers from the last two decades, this paper outlines where things go amiss during a building’s lifetime if a user perspective is excluded. The focus is on three phases: the development of new building technologies, the design and construction of buildings, and occupancy. The question of how building regulations could be redesigned to regulate energy use better is explored, along with what research and strategies are needed within four domains: developing alternative measures to energy per square meter; developing more advanced models simulating occupancy; improving feedback technologies' usability; and the increased use of commissioning and post-occupancy evaluations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building regulations; buildings; Denmark; energy consumption; energy demand; Energy Performance of Buildings Directive; governance; occupants; performance gap; policy measures; user practices
Index terms: energy use, energy consumption, comfort, design and construction, policy measure, post-occupancy evaluation, energy efficiency, building regulation, governance, Europe, energy demand, Denmark, consultancy, policy instrument, performance gap, commissioning, documents, strategy, usability, energy performance of buildings directive, user perspective, research paper, building technology
Subjects: occupational health and safety management, environmental law, regulatory law, completion, management, physical geography and landforms, performance management, Geography, professional development, sustainability and energy, energy systems, contractual arrangements, evaluation methods, research dissemination and communication, policy studies, business, organization, user-centered design, user focus, engineering systems
Topics: Quality Management, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Governance, Sustainability, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here