Herrmann, M R; Brumby, D P; Oreszczyn, T and Gilbert, X M P (2018) Does data visualization affect users' understanding of electricity consumption? Building Research & Information, 46(3), pp. 238-250. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Different data visualizations are investigated for how they enable occupants to learn about domestic energy consumption. Smart metering can potentially encourage householders to change their behaviour and save energy. However, concerns exist about whether users understand domestic energy feedback. Two challenges are addressed: feedback displays typically show aggregate consumption and they show time-series data visualizations, which are difficult to relate to everyday actions in the household. A laboratory experiment (N = 43) assessed changes in participants' knowledge of how much electricity everyday actions consume after being exposed to different forms of energy-consumption data visualizations: (1) an aggregated time-series line graph, (2) a disaggregated time-series line graph and (3) a normalized disaggregated visualization that deemphasized time. Participants played an energy game both before and after they saw the simulation. Participants in condition (3) were more accurate and more confident in their post-test judgments about everyday domestic electricity consumption than other participants. These findings suggest that the type of data visualization affects users' understanding of domestic electricity consumption. The visualization of disaggregated energy feedback at the appliance level should be considered for future generations of technology.;Different data visualizations are investigated for how they enable occupants to learn about domestic energy consumption. Smart metering can potentially encourage householders to change their behaviour and save energy. However, concerns exist about whether users understand domestic energy feedback. Two challenges are addressed: feedback displays typically show aggregate consumption and they show time-series data visualizations, which are difficult to relate to everyday actions in the household. A laboratory experiment (N = 43) assessed changes in participants' knowledge of how much electricity everyday actions consume after being exposed to different forms of energy-consumption data visualizations: (1) an aggregated time-series line graph, (2) a disaggregated time-series line graph and (3) a normalized disaggregated visualization that deemphasized time. Participants played an energy game both before and after they saw the simulation. Participants in condition (3) were more accurate and more confident in their post-test judgments about everyday domestic electricity consumption than other participants. These findings suggest that the type of data visualization affects users' understanding of domestic electricity consumption. The visualization of disaggregated energy feedback at the appliance level should be considered for future generations of technology.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | feedback; smart meters; disaggregation; agency; behaviour change; energy demand; time series; data visualization; energy literacy; Energy consumption; Visualization; Judgments; Energy; Electricity; Energy conservation; Electricity consumption; Household appliances; Residential energy; Scientific visualization |
| Index terms: | smart meter, energy feedback, consumption, scientific visualization, judgment, laboratory, electricity consumption, energy literacy, disaggregation, visualization, agency, behaviour change, energy demand, household, aggregate, time series, residential energy, experiment, data visualization, energy consumption, energy conservation |
| Subjects: | design practice, sociology, consumer economics, data science, analytical methods, dispute resolution, data collection methods, materials science, behavioral psychology, demography, energy systems, research management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here