Where does the money go? Economic flow analysis of construction projects

Ioannidou, D; Zerbi, S; García de Soto, B and Habert, G (2018) Where does the money go? Economic flow analysis of construction projects. Building Research & Information, 46(4), pp. 348-366. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

A new approach is introduced for analysing the economic flows in a construction project that will complement the existing methods. The main focus of the new method is to trace the flow of costs in the project and identify their spatial characteristics as well as who are the final recipients. This type of analysis highlights the flow of costs of the specific project in the local economy. It can be used for decision-making purposes from the project-commissioning party. Costs were divided into six categories, namely: labour, materials, energy, office overheads, taxes and personnel, and into two levels: local and national. Three case studies of stone and reinforced concrete structures were selected and analysed to test the application of this method. The case studies showed that this method and the representation by a Sankey diagram can provide useful insights regarding both the spatialized distribution of the cost of a project and the economic flows going to direct labour versus overhead and taxes. For future projects, local authorities or developers can select the most economically suitable strategy maximizing the income of the local community.;A new approach is introduced for analysing the economic flows in a construction project that will complement the existing methods. The main focus of the new method is to trace the flow of costs in the project and identify their spatial characteristics as well as who are the final recipients. This type of analysis highlights the flow of costs of the specific project in the local economy. It can be used for decision-making purposes from the project-commissioning party. Costs were divided into six categories, namely: labour, materials, energy, office overheads, taxes and personnel, and into two levels: local and national. Three case studies of stone and reinforced concrete structures were selected and analysed to test the application of this method. The case studies showed that this method and the representation by a Sankey diagram can provide useful insights regarding both the spatialized distribution of the cost of a project and the economic flows going to direct labour versus overhead and taxes. For future projects, local authorities or developers can select the most economically suitable strategy maximizing the income of the local community.;

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: localization; development; local economy; construction costs; built environment; material flow; local development; economic flows; labour; Economic analysis; Costs; Construction; Decision making; Spatial discrimination; Project engineering; Construction industry; Reinforced concrete; Case studies; Concrete structures; Taxes; Taxation; Cost analysis
Index terms: cost analysis, local economy, personnel, strategy, local authority, decision-making, construction project, reinforced concrete, commissioning, economic analysis, case study, local development, construction cost, project engineering, income, built environment, spatial discrimination, construction industry, concrete structure, economic flow, localization, overheads, taxation
Subjects: decision analysis, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, completion, financial analysis, structural engineering, management, spatial and geospatial analysis, policy economics, production management, urban design, urban planning, design analysis, building materials, economic analysis, financial and cost management, data collection methods, control systems
Topics: Quality Management, Human Resources, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Governance, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Regulations & Compliance
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here