Sustainability assessment of cities: SDGs and GHG emissions

Kawakubo, S; Murakami, S; Ikaga, T and Asami, Y (2018) Sustainability assessment of cities: SDGs and GHG emissions. Building Research & Information, 46(5), pp. 528-539. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The United Nations' (UN) sustainable development goals (SDGs), the core of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the UN Paris Agreement, were adopted in 2015. Involvement of not only national governments but also all other stakeholders including local governments is important to promote sustainable development and to achieve the goals. The question arises, therefore, of what methods should be used to best implement and assess sustainability issues at a local level. In this light, a new version of Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency (CASBEE), CASBEE for Cities, is introduced for assessing the sustainability of cities and communities around the world based on SDG indicators and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tool allows users to understand the sustainability of cities and communities based on quality (Q) and environmental load (L) perspectives. The sustainability assessments show that cities in developed countries tend to have good grades for Q, but bad grades for L, while cities in developing countries tend to have the opposite trend. This will assist cities and communities in both developed and developing countries to understand urgent problems and to identify effective solutions for sustainable development.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: assessment system; cities; greenhouse gases; sustainability criteria; sustainable cities; sustainable development goals
Index terms: greenhouse gas, developed country, sustainable development, sustainability assessment, developing country, local government, sustainable development goal, built environment, Paris, sustainable city, United Nations, efficiency
Subjects: administrative law, infrastructure and transport systems, health safety and environment, Geography, sustainable design, development economics, urban design, sustainability assessment, performance management, institutional frameworks, climate science
Topics: Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Governance, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Quality Management, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here