Leo, L S; Buccolieri, R and Di Sabatino, S (2018) Scale-adaptive morphometric analysis for urban air quality and ventilation applications. Building Research & Information, 46(8), pp. 931-951. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
A novel, flexible method to derive urban morphometric parameters is presented. Through selected examples, it demonstrates its employability in a wide range of applications. This method builds upon an extension of an image-based technique for the treatment of building data to discuss objective criteria for model grid choice and related consequences. Starting from an estimation of aerodynamic parameters, and their validation by computational fluid dynamics using an existing simulation of downtown Oklahoma City in the US, the method is used to evaluate improvements in the performance of an operational dispersion model. Results are applied to flow over a neighbourhood for the determination of ventilation parameters. It is suggested that the grid used for calculation of morphometric parameters provides the best agreement with data from laboratory experiments when the selection of grid size is made upon the spatial profile of building height standard deviation and maximum building height. The implication is that when a mesoscale numerical model is employed, morphometric parameters should be calculated by positioning the computational grid based on physical boundaries, while for finer resolution (namely, smaller scale) numerical models, morphometric parameters should be calculated using the street grid as external boundary, and the maximum building height criterion performs well.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | air quality; built form; microclimates; urban design; urban form; urban planning; ventilation |
| Index terms: | ventilation, urban form, building height, employability, deviation, aerodynamic, urban design, experiment, resolution, microclimate, computational fluid dynamics, air quality, built form, boundaries, validation, numerical model, estimation, urban planning, laboratory |
| Subjects: | urban design, modelling and simulation, climate science, building performance, research management, factor and component analysis, data collection methods, professional development, property law, financial and cost management, urban planning, human resources and leadership, conflict resolution, urban form and morphology, air quality |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Education, Cost Management, Information Management, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here