Socio-technical case study method in building performance evaluation

Lowe, R; Chiu, L F and Oreszczyn, T (2018) Socio-technical case study method in building performance evaluation. Building Research & Information, 46(5), pp. 469-484. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Raymond J. Cole’s body of work, spanning sustainable design, system complexity and human agency, has encouraged researchers to reconceptualize the notions of comfort and building performance. However, methods for predicting energy use and assessing environmental performance have remained predominantly within a reductionist approach common to physics and engineering. The recognition that building performance is characterized by interactive adaptivity and co-evolution of the physical with the social has not been matched by the generation of new methods. Although social practice theories that articulate the socio-technical nature of the built environment have been increasingly appropriated to understand occupants' role in performance, the challenge of studying buildings as complex socio-technical systems remains. This methodological paper discusses the application of the case study method (CSM) to the study of 10 retrofit projects selected from the Retrofit for the Future (RfF) Programme in UK between 2011 and 2012. Guided by Greene’s framework for methodological discourse, the epistemic regime is articulated under four headings: philosophical assumptions, investigative logics, guidelines for practice and contribution to system perspective. The discussion of these domains highlights the fecundity of CSM in providing a more nuanced understanding of the interaction between social and technical systems in performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building performance; case study; post-occupancy evaluation; research methods; retrofit; socio-technical
Index terms: built environment, environmental performance, programme, building performance, complexity, building performance evaluation, evolution, agency, comfort, post-occupancy evaluation, socio-technical, energy use, social practice theory, case study, sustainable design, interaction, socio-technical system
Subjects: design process, theoretical framing, infrastructure and transport systems, quality assurance, occupational health and safety management, evaluation methods, sociology, sustainability assessment, research methods, project controls, data collection methods, systems engineering, building performance, behavioral psychology, environmental science, energy systems
Topics: Health and Safety, Time Control, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Research Practice, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here