Assessing the environmental performance of buildings: Trends, lessons and tensions

Lützkendorf, T (2018) Assessing the environmental performance of buildings: Trends, lessons and tensions. Building Research & Information, 46(5), pp. 594-614. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Since the 1970s, intense discussions have occurred within the research and practitioner communities on how to assess and influence the environmental performance of buildings. Many different methods, criteria and tools were developed to raise awareness, enable goal formulation, support design and decision-making processes, and evaluate a building’s environmental performance. This development can be retraced through the example of the works of Raymond J. Cole, who made an important contribution to this scientific debate. The integration of environmental performance into a sustainability assessment, the ongoing development of life cycle assessment (LCA) methods, and clients', financiers' and assessors' different demands for environmental performance assessment, raise additional questions and highlight the conflicting goals. Six topics are examined in relation to current developments: the further development of the classic 'three pillars' sustainability model; the suitability of assessment criteria and indicators; the handling of technological progress; the discounting of environmental impacts; the environmental assessment of existing buildings; and the further development of legal requirements. 'Time' is a key factor relating to LCA, weighing current versus future emissions, ecological value and recycling potential of existing buildings or 'options' for different ways to use the building in future. Recommended actions are provided for key stakeholders.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; decision process; design process; environmental indicators; environmental performance; life cycle; sustainability assessment; time
Index terms: option, decision process, decision-making process, recycling, life cycle, environmental performance, environmental assessment, suitability, practitioner, environmental impact, environmental performance assessment, integration, life cycle assessment, design process, sustainability assessment
Subjects: waste management, environmental impact, practitioner, design methods, value management, design criteria, organizational analysis, decision analysis, sustainability assessment
Topics: Project Management, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Design Practice, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here