Machline, E; Pearlmutter, D and Schwartz, M (2018) Parisian eco-districts: Low energy and affordable housing? Building Research & Information, 46(6), pp. 636-652. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
This paper examines how policies and practices for affordable housing in Paris, especially 'green' housing for the poor, are being subverted to retain or attract the middle class: the 'greentrification' of lower-class neighbourhoods. From the 1960s onward, many middle- and working-class households have left Paris due to de-industrialization and the city’s high housing costs. To bring these middle classes back, the municipality initiated a policy calling for increased social diversity, using social housing as its main policy tool. In France the provision of public housing is legally mandated, and compared with international standards, the income ceilings for gaining access to it are high. Thus, municipalities may pursue urban renovation and construct social housing for the middle class to replace substandard buildings occupied by low-income populations. The Paris municipality has established 'green' residential eco-districts known as 'eco-quartiers'. In the national eco-district programme, the neighbourhoods must meet environmental performance criteria, show potential for economic development, and provide social and functional diversity. Thus, housing location and price must fit the needs of the existing residents. However, most 'green' subsidized housing in Paris is for the middle class. Social diversity has become a means of redistribution: more middle class and fewer poor people.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | affordable housing; communities; eco-neighbourhood; France; gentrification; public policy; social diversity; social housing; urban politics |
| Index terms: | low energy, environmental performance, public housing, household, income, Paris, affordable housing, renovation, gentrification, social housing, economic development, France, programme, industrialization, population, housing, municipality, urban politic, public policy |
| Subjects: | construction type, urban planning, public policy, energy systems, economic analysis, renovation and retrofit, sustainability assessment, economic development, Geography, urban design, housing and residential development, demography, project controls, administrative law |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Governance, Construction Technology, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here