Relationships between construction clients and participants of the building industry: Structures and mechanisms of coordination and communication

De Blois, M; Herazo-Cueto, B; Latunova, I and Lizarralde, G (2011) Relationships between construction clients and participants of the building industry: Structures and mechanisms of coordination and communication. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 7(1), pp. 3-22. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

This article examines the factors that determine the relationships between project clients and participants of the building industry at two different levels: at the level of the structures created for project procurement and at the level of formal and informal mechanisms of coordination and communication between the client and participants of the building industry, integrated within the project's temporary multi-organization (TMO). Contrary to the majority of contributions in project governance in construction, this research analyses both inter-organization and intra-organization relations in order to challenge existing configurations of the TMO based on procurement strategies. The research, based on comparative case studies of institutional clients in Canada, examines (a) the functioning of the structures and contractual relations between clients and their main consultants and contractors and (b) the formal and informal mechanisms of coordination used by client representatives (notably mechanisms based on informal communication). The results highlight important characteristics of the mechanisms of communication between the institutional client and other members of the project TMO. The study (based on document analysis, observations, interviews and network mapping) concludes that the structure of the TMO, as derived from procurement strategies, does not reflect the real relations between project participants.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: communication management; construction procurement; institutions; organizations; temporary multi-organization
Index terms: construction client, configuration, procurement strategy, project procurement, document analysis, building industry, coordination, construction procurement, temporary multi-organization, project client, mapping, interview, governance, Canada, contractual relations, case study
Subjects: management, practitioner, sociology, industry analysis, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, contract law, business, systems engineering, data science, spatial and geospatial analysis, Geography
Topics: Organizational Design, Research Practice, Procurement, Business Strategy, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here