Parkinson, A T; Reid, R; McKerrow, H and Wright, D (2018) Evaluating positivist theories of occupant satisfaction: A statistical analysis. Building Research & Information, 46(4), pp. 430-443. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
An explorative statistical analysis of consistent non-domestic building performance studies is conducted non-domestic buildings (n = 47) to validate the universal positions of comfort widely cited in industry guidance and standards. The Building Use Studies (BUS) methodology for evaluating occupant satisfaction employed by these studies was tested for reliability and the factor structure explored. The reliability of this method was found to be 'excellent' and eight latent variables that characterize a hierarchical factor structure induced. Increased visual display unit use and open-plan arrangements were found to be associated with negative occupant perceptions. This suggests that privacy and personal communication may be defining issues for occupant satisfaction, with implications for space planning. Significantly different perceptions towards air quality and conditions in winter were observed between gender and those familiar with their environments were found to have a tendency to hold more negative perceptions more broadly. It has also been found that perceptions towards seasonal conditions may be improved by providing local control to mechanical services. Such insights highlight the limitations of reliance on positivist theory. Hence, it is recommended that high-performance buildings be provided control and management systems that learn from those occupying the building over time, cautiously adapting service provision accordingly.;An explorative statistical analysis of consistent non-domestic building performance studies is conducted non-domestic buildings (n = 47) to validate the universal positions of comfort widely cited in industry guidance and standards. The Building Use Studies (BUS) methodology for evaluating occupant satisfaction employed by these studies was tested for reliability and the factor structure explored. The reliability of this method was found to be 'excellent' and eight latent variables that characterize a hierarchical factor structure induced. Increased visual display unit use and open-plan arrangements were found to be associated with negative occupant perceptions. This suggests that privacy and personal communication may be defining issues for occupant satisfaction, with implications for space planning. Significantly different perceptions towards air quality and conditions in winter were observed between gender and those familiar with their environments were found to have a tendency to hold more negative perceptions more broadly. It has also been found that perceptions towards seasonal conditions may be improved by providing local control to mechanical services. Such insights highlight the limitations of reliance on positivist theory. Hence, it is recommended that high-performance buildings be provided control and management systems that learn from those occupying the building over time, cautiously adapting service provision accordingly.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | post-occupancy evaluation; building evaluation; occupant satisfaction; building performance; occupant surveys; Personal communication; Statistical analysis; Buildings; Visual aspects; Management systems; Residential buildings; Structural reliability; Air quality; Reliability engineering; Displays; Reliability aspects; Statistics; Structural hierarchy; Reliability analysis; Energy management |
| Index terms: | structural reliability, energy management, statistics, comfort, building evaluation, personal communication, occupant satisfaction, air quality, non-domestic building, statistical analysis, occupant perception, post-occupancy evaluation, reliability analysis, residential building, visual aspect, structural hierarchy, privacy, reliability aspect, reliability engineering, space planning, methodology, building performance, management system, winter, occupant survey |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, asset management, professional ethics, quality assurance, design elements, structural engineering, management, research methods, design process, sustainability and energy, professional practice, data science, evaluation methods, construction type, data collection methods, user-centered design, mathematical modelling, human factors and perception, health behaviours and lifestyles, climate science, reliability engineering |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here