Robison, R A V and Foulds, C (2018) Constructing policy success for UK energy feedback. Building Research & Information, 46(3), pp. 316-331. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Energy-feedback tools are commonly used to promote energy saving. In the UK, energy-feedback provision (currently via an in-home display) is part of the government-mandated roll-out of smart meters to all homes by 2020. A core assumption underlying this widespread provision is that information, or evidence, can lead to positive changes in action. This is analogous to assumptions underlying the notion of 'evidence-based policy', and raises questions about how users, researchers and policy-makers go about using evidence when aiming for a 'successful' outcome. In addition, the 'policy feedback' research agenda has asked how policies alter the landscapes within which they operate by, for example, affecting relationships between actors. Via an in-depth review of Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) policy literature over 2010-16, the UK smart meter roll-out was analysed in terms of how its energy-feedback-focused measures may be deemed as 'successful'. Findings include the fact that direct energy savings played a smaller role than might be expected, and translation from one success measure to another was repeatedly observed. A key conclusion is that acting on feedback requires an assessment of success, but such assessment is highly contextual, for consumers and policy-makers alike. Ways to increase reflexivity in this area are discussed.;Energy-feedback tools are commonly used to promote energy saving. In the UK, energy-feedback provision (currently via an in-home display) is part of the government-mandated roll-out of smart meters to all homes by 2020. A core assumption underlying this widespread provision is that information, or evidence, can lead to positive changes in action. This is analogous to assumptions underlying the notion of 'evidence-based policy', and raises questions about how users, researchers and policy-makers go about using evidence when aiming for a 'successful' outcome. In addition, the 'policy feedback' research agenda has asked how policies alter the landscapes within which they operate by, for example, affecting relationships between actors. Via an in-depth review of Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) policy literature over 2010-16, the UK smart meter roll-out was analysed in terms of how its energy-feedback-focused measures may be deemed as 'successful'. Findings include the fact that direct energy savings played a smaller role than might be expected, and translation from one success measure to another was repeatedly observed. A key conclusion is that acting on feedback requires an assessment of success, but such assessment is highly contextual, for consumers and policy-makers alike. Ways to increase reflexivity in this area are discussed.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | feedback; household energy; smart meters; evidence-based design; policy feedback; policy evaluation; energy; governance; public policy; Climate change; Landscapes; Government agencies; Environmental policy; Energy conservation; Measuring instruments; Energy policy; Success |
| Index terms: | research agenda, reflexivity, government agency, policy evaluation, evidence-based policy, energy policy, smart meter, evidence, measuring instrument, public policy, environmental policy, climate change, energy feedback, governance, evidence-based design, policy feedback, energy-saving, household, energy conservation |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, energy systems, public policy, climate science, design methods, policy studies, business, evaluation and assessment methods, research paradigm research concept, administrative law, research management, demography |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Governance, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here