Digital energy visualizations in the workplace: The e-genie tool

Spence, A; Goulden, M; Leygue, C; Banks, N; Bedwell, B; Jewell, M; Yang, R and Ferguson, E (2018) Digital energy visualizations in the workplace: The e-genie tool. Building Research & Information, 46(3), pp. 272-283. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Building management systems are designed for energy managers; there are few energy-feedback systems designed to engage staff. A tool, known as e-Genie, was created with the purpose of engaging workplace occupants with energy data and supporting them to take action to reduce energy use. Building on research insights within the field, e-Genie's novel approach encourages users to make plans to meet energy-saving goals, supports discussion and considers social energy behaviours (e.g. discussing energy issues, taking part in campaigns) as well as individual actions. A field-based study of e-Genie indicated that visualizations of energy data were engaging and that the discussion 'Pinboard' was particularly popular. Pre- and post-survey (N = 77) evaluation of users indicated that people were significantly more concerned about energy issues and reported engaging more in social energy behaviour after about two weeks of e-Genie being installed. Concurrently, objective measures of electricity use decreased over the same period, and continued decreasing over subsequent weeks. Indications are that occupant-facing energy-feedback visualizations can be successful in reducing energy use in the workplace; furthermore, supporting social energy behaviour in the workplace is likely to be a useful direction for promoting action.;Building management systems are designed for energy managers; there are few energy-feedback systems designed to engage staff. A tool, known as e-Genie, was created with the purpose of engaging workplace occupants with energy data and supporting them to take action to reduce energy use. Building on research insights within the field, e-Genie's novel approach encourages users to make plans to meet energy-saving goals, supports discussion and considers social energy behaviours (e.g. discussing energy issues, taking part in campaigns) as well as individual actions. A field-based study of e-Genie indicated that visualizations of energy data were engaging and that the discussion 'Pinboard' was particularly popular. Pre- and post-survey (N = 77) evaluation of users indicated that people were significantly more concerned about energy issues and reported engaging more in social energy behaviour after about two weeks of e-Genie being installed. Concurrently, objective measures of electricity use decreased over the same period, and continued decreasing over subsequent weeks. Indications are that occupant-facing energy-feedback visualizations can be successful in reducing energy use in the workplace; furthermore, supporting social energy behaviour in the workplace is likely to be a useful direction for promoting action.;

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: feedback; energy reduction; non-domestic buildings; behaviour change; energy demand; data visualization; energy-use behaviour; digital technologies; energy literacy; user engagement; workplace; occupants; Energy consumption; Social behavior; Energy use; Energy; Energy conservation; Energy management; Building management systems
Index terms: non-domestic building, energy demand, user engagement, energy management, energy conservation, energy use, energy consumption, energy-saving, energy literacy, data visualization, energy reduction, survey, behaviour change, building management system, manager, digital technology, visualization, energy-use behaviour, social behaviour
Subjects: design practice, behavioral psychology, computing systems, practitioner, health behaviours and lifestyles, design methods, construction type, data collection methods, mechanical systems, energy systems, data science, sustainability and energy
Topics: Digital Applications, Design Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here