Housing performance evaluation: Challenges for international knowledge exchange

Stevenson, F and Baborska-Narozny, M (2018) Housing performance evaluation: Challenges for international knowledge exchange. Building Research & Information, 46(5), pp. 501-512. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Developing effective building performance evaluation and feedback processes is a vital part of global efforts to reduce building energy use and gain insight into the actual performance of buildings and technologies. Although attempts have been made to introduce internationally agreed models for these processes, it is clear that various countries are producing different approaches according to their cultural, institutional and policy differences. Knowledge exchange is potentially a key means of developing a shared understanding of values, meanings and practices in relation to building performance evaluation. This paper identifies cultural and institutional barriers in the European Union for international building performance communities of practice utilizing knowledge exchange, from an experiential 'real-world' perspective. The preparation of a 30-month research project to help develop building performance evaluation in Poland and an associated bilateral symposium is closely evaluated through an action research case study in terms of the stakeholders, the national contexts in which they operated and the key challenges they faced. Recommendations are then made in terms of the support needed to develop more responsive research programmes in relation to developing international knowledge exchange, and the capacity-building elements required for these international communities of practice.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building performance evaluation; communities of practice; culture; feedback; housing; international policy; knowledge exchange; performance assessment
Index terms: building energy use, performance assessment, case study, Poland, housing, housing performance, action research, building performance evaluation, communities of practice, European Union, building performance, meaning, programme, knowledge exchange
Subjects: assessment methods, Geography, project controls, data collection methods, knowledge management, quality assurance, sustainability and energy, sociology, construction type, physical geography and landforms, building performance, economic analysis
Topics: Information Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Research Practice, Human Resources, Quality Management, Geographical Context, Time Control, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here