Sunikka-Blank, M; Galvin, R and Behar, C (2018) Harnessing social class, taste and gender for more effective policies. Building Research & Information, 46(1), pp. 114-126. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
This paper explores why domestic energy policies, thermal retrofitting and the operation of domestic energy-efficient technologies are often met with social inertia in practice. Two sets of interview data - UK homeowners who have retrofitted their property and social housing tenants living in energy-efficient housing - reveal a very different mix of habits, skills and attitudes regarding domestic heating, rooted in socio-economic background and further determined by tenure. Middle-class homeowners' retrofit design were part of their social and economic capital and self-expression of taste. These aspirational retrofits were characterized by comfort, conspicuous consumption and do-it-yourself (DIY) activities. Policy should strengthen these 'paths of least resistance' by providing resources to harness the taste-motivated retrofit stream. In contrast, the less-privileged tenant group struggled with the basic interaction with new technologies imposed on them and need more tailor-made paths: simpler heating controls; a simpler manual for some; and practical measures such as burglar-proof natural ventilation. The paper explores how social stratification and status-led consumption can be brought into understandings of energy retrofitting practices. Reflecting on gender in such contexts could also help to overcome exclusion practices and stereotyping, and there are market opportunities for retrofit packages to engage women and harness their emerging interest in DIY.;This paper explores why domestic energy policies, thermal retrofitting and the operation of domestic energy-efficient technologies are often met with social inertia in practice. Two sets of interview data - UK homeowners who have retrofitted their property and social housing tenants living in energy-efficient housing - reveal a very different mix of habits, skills and attitudes regarding domestic heating, rooted in socio-economic background and further determined by tenure. Middle-class homeowners' retrofit design were part of their social and economic capital and self-expression of taste. These aspirational retrofits were characterized by comfort, conspicuous consumption and do-it-yourself (DIY) activities. Policy should strengthen these 'paths of least resistance' by providing resources to harness the taste-motivated retrofit stream. In contrast, the less-privileged tenant group struggled with the basic interaction with new technologies imposed on them and need more tailor-made paths: simpler heating controls; a simpler manual for some; and practical measures such as burglar-proof natural ventilation. The paper explores how social stratification and status-led consumption can be brought into understandings of energy retrofitting practices. Reflecting on gender in such contexts could also help to overcome exclusion practices and stereotyping, and there are market opportunities for retrofit packages to engage women and harness their emerging interest in DIY.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | household energy; social theory; thermal retrofit; gender issues; public policy; energy efficiency; Social housing; Retrofitting; Energy policy; Capital; Social class; Housing; Energy; Heating; Ventilation; New technology; Stratification; Residential energy; Habits |
| Index terms: | tenant, residential energy, homeowner, energy policy, ventilation, social class, interview, energy retrofitting, public policy, consumption, habit, retrofitting, housing, stratification, do-it-yourself, stream, natural ventilation, energy efficiency, package, new technology, domestic heating, social theory, interaction, social housing, tenure, household, gender issue, women, comfort, thermal retrofit |
| Subjects: | social theory, water management, design practice, renovation and retrofit, energy efficiency, behavioral psychology, environmental engineering, social justice, sociology, housing and residential development, demography, occupational health and safety management, practitioner, health behaviours and lifestyles, consumer economics, air quality, mechanical systems, data collection methods, construction type, innovation and technology management, contractual arrangements, energy systems, public policy, real estate economics, sustainability and energy |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Governance, Construction Technology, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Ethics, Urban Studies, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here