Abuimara, T; O’Brien, W; Gunay, B and Carrizo, J S (2019) Towards occupant-centric simulation-aided building design: A case study. Building Research & Information, 47(8), pp. 866-882. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
This paper aims at illustrating the importance of occupant modelling for decision-making during the building design process. It identifies the energy implications of conventional ways of modelling occupants for the design of office buildings. Furthermore, it presents a step towards bridging the gap between the research efforts and conventional practices within the field of building performance simulation (BPS) aided design. The paper first describes occupant-related assumptions that were made during the design process of a case study office building, obtained via stakeholder interviews. Then, the impact of these assumptions on the design decisions is examined through a simulation-based investigation. The stakeholder interviews revealed that professionals from each design discipline made significantly different assumptions about occupants. The simulation results showed that assumptions about occupants and their behaviour impacted predicted energy savings of some design decisions by a factor of five or more.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building design; energy use intensity; occupant-related assumptions; performance simulation; simulation-aided design; stakeholder interviews |
| Index terms: | office building, building performance simulation, interview, investigation, design decision, design process, performance simulation, energy-use intensity, case study, building design, decision-making, energy-saving, modelling |
| Subjects: | modelling and simulation, analytical methods, energy systems, construction type, design methods, decision analysis, data collection methods, architectural design, design practice |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here