Aragon, V; Gauthier, S; Warren, P; James, P A B and Anderson, B (2019) Developing English domestic occupancy profiles. Building Research & Information, 47(4), pp. 375-393. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Occupancy patterns are necessary to estimate energy demand and evaluate thermal comfort in households. Because of this, many European countries are developing representative domestic schedules to replace outdated criteria. This paper evaluates the state of knowledge of UK domestic occupancy patterns and develops new domestic occupancy profiles for England. The presented research (1) characterizes methods for collecting occupancy data and inferring patterns; (2) identifies and assesses the quality of categories of occupancy patterns used in building simulation; and (3) develops updated occupancy profiles. A systematic scoping review identified social and monitoring surveys as the most deployed data-collection methods. A systematic literature review also established that the occupancy categories most frequently used in UK building simulation are (a) a family with dependent children where the parents work full time; and (b) a retired elderly couple who spend most of their time indoors. The interview sample from the English Housing Survey 2014–15 was used to map household typologies. Results show that categories (a) and (b) combined amount to only 19% of England’s households, which suggest models are over-reliant on these groups. Considering this result, the paper develops occupancy patterns for England derived from 2015 UK Time Use Survey diaries for each household typology previously identified.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | demographics; households; modelling; monitoring; occupancy patterns; occupant behaviour; occupants; social survey; time; time use |
| Index terms: | children, household, monitoring, elderly, demographics, systematic literature review, thermal comfort, occupancy profile, interview, England, building simulation, housing, estimate, occupant behaviour, energy demand, modelling, diary, survey |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, construction type, demography, research evaluation and metrics, building performance, Geography, environmental engineering, data collection methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, modelling and simulation, energy systems, control systems, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Digital Applications, Cost Management, Site Management, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here