Service controls interfaces in housing: Usability and engagement tool development

Baborska-Narożny, M and Stevenson, F (2019) Service controls interfaces in housing: Usability and engagement tool development. Building Research & Information, 47(3), pp. 290-304. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Domestic buildings are increasingly complex, saturated with services that need coherent control if design and inhabitants' goals are to be achieved. The evidenced inappropriate use of controls linked with a performance gap suggests that effective methods for assessing the inhabitants' relationship with control interfaces for services are needed within building performance evaluation and practice studies. The development of a bespoke domestic usability tool over two iterations is presented, demonstrating new insights into the relationship between design and inhabitant engagement with controls. Deep contextual development came from trialling the tool in four UK domestic case studies. Understanding the purpose of a control interface and the inhabitants' role was found to be a fundamental diagnostic for inhabitant engagement. The tool became a prompt for immediate action or further information-seeking for one-quarter of households involved in its application. However, the affordances and physical issues identified could not be addressed without major physical changes, which should have been picked up at the design and construction stages. Organizational learning based on the tool findings was triggered in one of four developers involved. The challenges for developing usability studies are discussed with recommendations provided for different actors in the housing and construction industry on how to progress them.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building controls; building evaluation; building performance; building services ergonomics; feedback; housing; inhabitants; usability
Index terms: building performance, usability, domestic building, organizational learning, affordance, building control, housing, performance gap, ergonomics, building service, case study, construction industry, building performance evaluation, household, design and construction, building evaluation
Subjects: engineering systems, user-centered design, data collection methods, construction type, contractual arrangements, professional development, health safety and environment, performance management, behavioral psychology, quality assurance, industry analysis, building performance, asset management, demography, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Procurement, Construction Technology, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here