Clearing the air on EU guidance projects for school buildings

Camacho-Montano, S C; Wagner, A; Erhorn-Kluttig, H; Mumovic, D and Summerfield, A (2019) Clearing the air on EU guidance projects for school buildings. Building Research & Information, 47(5), pp. 624-634. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Professionals engaged in the design of new or retrofit of existing school buildings currently struggle to find comprehensive guidelines for achieving healthy and energy-efficient school environments. Recently, two major and independent research projects aimed at improving indoor environmental quality and energy performance of school buildings in Europe have been completed: SINPHONIE and School of the Future. Their guidelines reflect the distinct priorities and limited scope of each project. This paper compares for the first time and, as far as possible, synthesizes these outputs to facilitate their use in practice and research. Overall, SINPHONIE is most useful in addressing indoor environmental quality of schools in terms of the physical, chemical and microbiological stressors that impact and potentially affect human health. It aims to influence the future development of policy and regulations. By contrast, School of the Future presents a broader design-oriented approach based on best practice in four European countries. For the most part they complement each other in their recommendations; however, this review highlights several areas that require further clarification and research including links between indoor environmental quality and cognitive performance, the consequent appropriate level for the designed ventilation rate, and the role of adaptive thermal comfort in schools.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: energy efficiency; health; indoor air quality; pollutants; school buildings; schools; thermal comfort; ventilation; wellbeing
Index terms: best practice, indoor environmental quality, thermal comfort, energy performance, energy efficiency, Europe, indoor air quality, school building, well-being, regulation, pollutant, stressors, school environment, human health, ventilation
Subjects: physical geography and landforms, public and environmental health, political science, environmental engineering, environmental health, learning environments, health conditions and diseases, construction type, mental health and wellbeing, business, air quality, energy systems, sustainability and energy
Topics: Sustainability, Governance, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Education
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here