Layered project-layered process: Lean thinking and flexible solutions

Hansen, G K and Olsson, N O E (2011) Layered project-layered process: Lean thinking and flexible solutions. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 7(2), pp. 70-84. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

This article elaborates on lean thinking in design management. Lean philosophy focuses on minimizing waste and maximizing value. We discuss how lean concepts can be understood and how this can affect the design process. In particular, we examine how flexibility can be achieved through the use of a layered design process and a layered building design. The design process has two main outcomes: input to the production and/or construction process, and input to the decision process. These two outcomes have a number of contradictory characteristics. Traditionally, production processes call for early decisions and control of cost, time and risks. Typically, this has been the engineers' or the contractors' perspective. In contrast, the decision process typically strives to postpone final commitments and design freeze in order to keep options open. Lean thinking shows that the two approaches do not have to be contradictory. Based on case studies of two hospital projects, we discuss flexibility in the design process and design in relation to lean principles. The article demonstrates the importance of seeing the design process and design model as two integrated parts. Lean thinking can serve as an enabler by focusing on reducing waste and increasing the customer's value.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: design; design management; flexibility; lean; value
Index terms: commitment, option, production process, philosophy, design management, building design, decision process, case study, design model, engineer, construction process, design process
Subjects: philosophical studies, decision analysis, design methods, design process, building construction, psychology, manufacturing engineering, profession, data collection methods, architectural design
Topics: Site Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Research Practice, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here