de Wilde, M and Spaargaren, G (2019) Designing trust: How strategic intermediaries choreograph homeowners' low-carbon retrofit experience. Building Research & Information, 47(4), pp. 362-374. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
In the Netherlands, as in other European countries, the uncertain, fragmented character of the low-carbon retrofit market hampers a transition towards sustainable housing. Connecting homeowners to supply-side actors of low-carbon retrofit procedures, products and technologies in ways satisfactory to homeowners forms an important, challenging task. Service design for the benefit of a customer-centric perspective might be a solution. This paper investigates the potential role of strategic intermediaries as agents of change located between supply-side actors and homeowners. It asks how strategic intermediaries choreograph low-carbon retrofit experiences of homeowners through the design of a 'customer journey'. Trust is a crucial determinant. This paper distinguishes between three customer-journey designs in which, depending on the role envisioned for homeowners, a different trust relation is foregrounded: a private design envisions homeowners as passive consumers who trust in the expertise offered by the intermediary; a civic design envisions homeowners as engaged consumer-citizens who trust their neighbours as reliable service representatives; and a public design envisions homeowners as critical customers who trust in the retrofit technologies and products offered. This implies an important role for policy actors in realizing ways for scaling up and institutionalizing all three low-carbon retrofit customer-journey designs on a national level.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | houses; market transformation; middle-out; retrofit; service design; strategic intermediaries; sustainable buildings; trust |
| Index terms: | market transformation, determinant, scaling, sustainable housing, intermediary, Netherlands, homeowner, sustainable building, agent |
| Subjects: | housing and residential development, sociology, Geography, sustainable construction, risk assessment, organization, business, economic and policy analysis, practitioner |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here