Integrated framework of home comfort: Relaxation, companionship and control

Ellsworth-Krebs, K; Reid, L and Hunter, C J (2019) Integrated framework of home comfort: Relaxation, companionship and control. Building Research & Information, 47(2), pp. 202-218. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Home comfort is posited here as the state of relaxation and wellbeing that results from companionship and control to manage the home as desired. To date, studies of comfort have been dominated by building and natural scientists, laboratory settings and technical approaches, which understand comfort in physical, and primarily thermal, terms. Yet, the extensive research on the meaning and making of home by sociologists, human geographers, historians, anthropologists and philosophers highlights that there is much more to inhabitants' expectations of the home than ensuring physiological 'needs' such as warmth. The home is imbued with emotional, social and cultural meaning, and is significant to individuals' wellbeing in terms of it being (idealized as) a place of rest, family, continuity, control and security. For the first time, this paper brings together home and housing scholarship to conceptualize the findings of a qualitative study on the meanings of home comfort. In doing so, it offers a broad empirically and conceptually informed framework of home comfort and challenges the existing constrained notions and practices for the provision of comfort.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: comfort; dwellings; home; home comfort; homemaking; housing; occupant satisfaction; thermal comfort
Index terms: thermal comfort, well-being, housing, laboratory, meaning, qualitative study, comfort, occupant satisfaction
Subjects: research management, environmental engineering, construction type, mental health and wellbeing, research design and methodology, user-centered design, sociology, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Sustainability, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here