Evans, S; Liddiard, R and Steadman, P (2019) Modelling a whole building stock: Domestic, non-domestic and mixed use. Building Research & Information, 47(2), pp. 156-172. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Work on energy use in buildings–in university research, professional practice and government–has tended to draw a broad distinction between 'the domestic stock' and 'the non-domestic stock'. A further tendency has been to focus attention on types of non-domestic buildings devoted to single uses (e.g. offices, shops or hospitals). This paper reports an empirical research programme in which the complete building stock in large areas of England and Wales is comprehensively represented in great detail, using a new method and model called 3DStock. The model breaks down activities by floor level and within each floor of every building. The results show that the extent of mixing of uses is much greater than has previously been acknowledged, especially towards the centres and in the older parts of towns and cities. These mixed-activity buildings are sometimes relatively simple combinations of domestic and non-domestic, e.g. urban retail with flats above, while others are complex mixtures of different non-domestic activities. The model can be used to investigate how these complex relationships influence energy use. It is argued that, at the larger scale, explicit account needs to be taken of the mixing of uses in future stock models for research and policy-making.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | activity; building stock; buildings; energy model; mixed use; non-domestic buildings; residential; topology; urban analysis |
| Index terms: | stock model, England, non-domestic building, building stock, topology, modelling, Wales, energy model, programme, professional practice, energy use |
| Subjects: | geometry and topology, economic analysis, Geography, construction type, project controls, energy systems, professional development, analytical methods, asset management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Time Control, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here