Evaluation of BIM energy performance and CO2 emissions assessment tools: A case study in warm weather

Galiano-Garrigós, A; García-Figueroa, A; Rizo-Maestre, C and González-Avilés, Á (2019) Evaluation of BIM energy performance and CO2 emissions assessment tools: A case study in warm weather. Building Research & Information, 47(7), pp. 787-812. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The EU members have adopted regulations and official methods for evaluating the energy performance in buildings. Most of these methods are applied at the end of the project phase, with few opportunities to correct erroneous design decisions when the desired building energy performance is not achieved. It is demonstrated that there is no European standard for sustainability and that the decision-making process during the development of a building project is compromised by the methodologies and some concepts, as thermal inertia, are withdrawn. Currently, the industry has been developing alternative tools for evaluating energy performance and CO2 emissions in buildings over their entire life cycle. These software programs, which belong to the BIM environment, use databases and make simplifications adapted to the stage of design when the software can be applied. The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the accuracy of this software and how the databases and simplifications influence the decision-making process in building design. Calculation examples are carried out with various tools and compared to real building performance data. The results demonstrate that, as with the official methods, the tools influence the results and therefore condition, sometimes wrongly, the decision-making process to produce better buildings.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: BIM; CO2 emissions; energy consumption; energy demand; energy performance; epbd
Index terms: design decision, weather, methodology, program, regulation, building performance, accuracy, energy performance, simplification, energy consumption, life cycle, decision-making process, database, building design, energy demand, CO2 emissions, case study
Subjects: design practice, management, research methods, software systems, professional development, data management, decision analysis, political science, quality assurance, data collection methods, air quality, value management, energy systems, architectural design
Topics: Sustainability, Governance, Risk Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here