Gunay, H B; Shen, W and Yang, C (2019) Text-mining building maintenance work orders for component fault frequency. Building Research & Information, 47(5), pp. 518-533. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Operators' work order descriptions in computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS) represent an untapped opportunity to benchmark a facility’s maintenance and operation performance. However, it is challenging to carry out analytics on these large and amorphous databases. This paper puts forward a text-mining method to extract information about failure patterns in building systems and components from CMMS databases. The method is executed in three steps. Step 1 is pre-processing to convert work order descriptions into a mathematical form that lends itself to a quantitative lexical analysis. Step 2 is clustering to focus on interesting sections of a CMMS database that contain work orders about failures in building systems and components–rather than less interesting routine maintenance and inspection activities. Step 3 is association rule-mining to identify the coexistence tendencies among the terms of cluster of interest (e.g. coexistence of the terms 'radiator' and 'leak'). This text-mining method is demonstrated by using two data sets. One data set was from a central heating and cooling plant with four boilers and five chillers; the other data set was from a cluster of 44 buildings. The results provide insights into per equipment breakdown of failure events, top system and component-level failure modes, and their occurrence frequencies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building operations; building performance; diagnostics; facilities management; fault detection; HVAC systems; maintenance; operator logbooks; text-mining |
| Index terms: | building performance, building maintenance, radiator, routine, building operation, facilities management, maintenance management system, database, inspection, failure mode, clustering, central heating, building system, mining |
| Subjects: | quality assurance, sociology, geotechnical engineering, data management, management, data science, reliability engineering, engineering systems, mechanical systems, construction type |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here