Customized performance evaluation approach for Indian green buildings

Gupta, R; Gregg, M; Manu, S; Vaidya, P and Dixit, M (2019) Customized performance evaluation approach for Indian green buildings. Building Research & Information, 47(1), pp. 56-74. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The green building movement in India is lacking an important link: ensuring that the design intent of such buildings is actually realized. This paper undertakes an exploratory investigation to develop and test a customized building performance evaluation (BPE) approach (I-BPE framework) for the Indian context. As academia is considered to be an initial primary outlet of BPE, a survey of experts is conducted to investigate the drivers and barriers for implementing BPE-based methods in educational curricula. The I-BPE approach is tested in a case study building to gain insights for refining the underlying methods and processes for conducting further BPE studies in the context of India. The expert survey reveals the lack of trained people for teaching BPE as a key challenge to its adoption, implying that trained people are needed as much as frameworks. To enable widespread adoption of I-BPE in India, what will be necessary is a new cadre of building performance evaluators who can be trained (or up-skilled) through formal or continuing education. This will need to be driven by both policy (energy code) and market transformation ('green' rating systems). A series of delivery routes are suggested to enable rapid and deeper learning.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building performance evaluation; education; energy efficiency; green buildings; India; post-occupancy evaluation
Index terms: building performance, continuing education, survey, energy code, movement, performance evaluation, green building, post-occupancy evaluation, energy efficiency, case study, India, building performance evaluation, academia, investigation, market transformation
Subjects: quality assurance, educational institutions, environmental law, building performance, professional development, Geography, performance measurement, design practice, evaluation methods, sustainability and energy, health behaviours and lifestyles, economic and policy analysis, data collection methods
Topics: Sustainability, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Education, Quality Management, Design Practice, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here