Conceptual approaches to wellbeing in buildings: A scoping review

Hanc, M; McAndrew, C and Ucci, M (2019) Conceptual approaches to wellbeing in buildings: A scoping review. Building Research & Information, 47(6), pp. 767-783. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Several industry-led initiatives in various countries demonstrate a new interest in wellbeing and buildings. This paper adopts a scoping review method aiming to establish the most prevalent and insightful definitions and dimensions of wellbeing in buildings applied in the recent published literature. The paper adopts a two-step method for identifying and categorizing the conceptual approaches to wellbeing encountered in the current literature. First, an overview is presented of the term 'wellbeing' and its development over time. Second, the broad wellbeing categories identified are further refined and complemented via a deductive approach, drawing the final set of conceptual themes informed by the papers reviewed in this study. Nine themes were identified, two of which deductively emerged from the papers included in this study: environmental satisfaction/comfort and cognitive performance/productivity. The findings emphasize the heterogeneity of conceptual approaches to research concerning 'wellbeing in buildings', an ambiguity between wellbeing outcomes or determinants, and the need for greater clarity on the relative contributions of different wellbeing dimensions to overall individual or population wellbeing. Based on these findings, future work could be carried out to provide guidance on how to evaluate claims of evidence-based building design which foster individual or population wellbeing.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; built environment; place; wellbeing
Index terms: well-being, population, evidence, drawing, built environment, comfort, determinant, dimension, building design, satisfaction, productivity
Subjects: project delivery, health monitoring assessment and metrics, architectural design, technical documentation, evaluation and assessment methods, risk assessment, mental health and wellbeing, infrastructure and transport systems, demography, occupational health and safety management, management
Topics: Design Practice, Urban Studies, Risk Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here